This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Daryl, Gotcha now. Yes, you can add entries for the velocity products and use the nex2img program to remap and convert to GIF images. Steve >From: Daryl Herzmann <address@hidden> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata >Keywords: 200309231832.h8NIWYk1021933 >Hiya UNIDATA, > >Thanks for your comments. I think I poorly phrased my second question. > >On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Unidata Support wrote: > >>As for 2), A composite of radial velocity is not really meaningful. >>It is only the radial component. The tangential wind is not provided. >>This is not a dual-doppler analysis - which can be done with the >>level II data-- NIDS images are just data bins. You could estimate >>U & V components along the bisection of the overlap regeion, but otherwise >>would be indeterminant (note that "away" values from one radar would be >>"toward" values in an adjacent image. > >I completely agree. > >>>From: Daryl Herzmann <address@hidden> >>>Organization: UCAR/Unidata >>>Keywords: 200309231418.h8NEIek1011225 >>> >>>2. Does nex2img 'do the right thing' when it comes to velocity >>> products? I realize compositing them is a beast, but most folks >>> just want to generate a single site geotiff. Looking at the >>> nex2gini.tbl, I notice a lack of velocity products. Can I >>> just add them in there? > >I realize compositing is not meaningful. I don't want to composite the >velocity data, but I want to use nex2img to create single site >georeferenced TIFs. I have active interest from the DMX and OAX offices >to produce single site SRM plots in geotiff format. Can I update >nex2gini.tbl with the velocity entries and have nex2img 'do the right >thing'? :) I am already generating single site geoTiffs of the n0r >product. That works great! > >The WFO offices want to be able to download historical SRM geotiffs and >put them into ArcPad and other GIS products. They can then look at the >SRM to determine areas they should look for storm damage and they want >something to compare the SRM with storm damage they survey. With GIS, >they can do all of this in the field on their handheld! > >Regarding the userComm meeting report. I have gotten quite a bit of >feedback from the Mapserver community regarding this product. I think it >has given a lot of visibility to UNIDATA and GEMPAK. I hope it hasn't >generated too many support@ questions! > >Sorry for the poorly worded question, > Daryl > >-- >/** > * Daryl Herzmann (address@hidden) > * Program Assistant -- Iowa Environmental Mesonet > * http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu > */ > >