[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20030227: SNDIAG

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: 20030227: SNDIAG
  • Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:45:29 -0700
Robert,

Had a little trouble replying to your message since your reply-to
was set as: Reply-to: address@hidden
Not sure about that address.

Anyhow, I had posted a binary of sndiag for solaris due to
a specific request but didn't post one for linux. And, yes, you will
be lacking the config dir in the binary dist to build locally
(you can grab it out of the source tar file). In the future,
I will include the config directory with the library tar file 
so that you have that directory if needed for linking against the $GEMLIB
files.

I'm in the middle of making a new release, so if you want to wait until
I post 5.6.J, I'll have the sndiag binary for that....or you can build from
source using the config directory mentioned above. If you go that route, to 
extract just that directory from the source tarfile (in $NAWIPS), use:

gunzip -c gempak_upc5.6.h.tar.gz | tar xvf - config

Steve Chiswell



>From: Robert Dewey <address@hidden>
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>Keywords: 200302272057.h1RKvjt03397

>
>Unidata Support,
>
>I installed the binary version of NAWIPS, and I want to install SNDIAG, how do
>  
>I do this? I downloaded the GEMPAK library and installed that to my $NAWIPS 
>top directory (/home/gempak/lib)...but when I try to "make all" in the SNDIAG 
>directory, I am missing the Makeinc.common file, and it appears as though I 
>need the $NAWIPS/include  and $NAWIPS/config directories also. Is there 
>anyway to install SNDIAG without having to install the source version?
>
>Thanks!
>Robert Dewey
>