[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20021003: gempak 5.6: SNEDIT problem (fwd)

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 20021003: gempak 5.6: SNEDIT problem (fwd)
  • Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:47:16 -0600

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:03:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: W. Maxham <address@hidden>
To: Paul Ruscher <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: 20021003: gempak 5.6:  SNEDIT problem


Thanks so much, it seems to be working!  Oh, that fickle gempak....


Chip Maxham



On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Paul Ruscher wrote:

> Thanks, Chiz - we will try it out and get back to you shortly...Paul
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Steve Chiswell wrote:
>
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > If your sounding data is on pressure levels, you probably want
>  SNPARM = PRES;TEMP;DWPT;DRCT;SPED;HGHT
> >
> > this is the snmerg.pack file:
> > PRES    .1    1050.    .1
> > TEMP  -127.     63.    .1
> > DWPT   -63.     63.    .1
> > DRCT     0.    360.   1.
> > SPED     0.    126.    .1
> > HGHT     0.  65534.   1.
> >
> > If you send me a sample of your ascii input file, I'd be
> > happy to give it a test here.
> >
> > Steve Chiswell
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Paul Ruscher wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone been able to get SNEDIT to work properly?
> > >
> > > We have some data we converted from ASCII and what used to work in version
> > > 5.4 no longer seems to work.  So we created a file from SNLIST and ran it
> > > through SNEDIT and got the exact same error:
> > >
> > >   [SNEDIT  -8]    Edit file parms don't match those in data set.
> > >
> > > Our parms are
> > >
> > >   HGHT; TEMP; DWPT; DRCT; SPED
> > >
> > > and we are using the snmerg.pack file which is the default (has same
> > > parameter list).
> > >
> > > Anyone working with SNEDIT on 5.6 having seen similar behavior (or even
> > > better, having success)?  I would appreciate hearing from you!  Thanks.
> > >
> > > We can file-share if anyone is interested...let us know.  Paul
> > >
> >
>
>