Christian, I would be happy to look at your changes. I try not to make any changes that I would have to continually update when I get new releases of GEMPAK from NCEP. Rather, I would ask if they wanted to accept these additions. If the changes are isolated into a bridge/mt routine, it should be straight forward. Also, if you can provide a reference for the RMK coding practice used by CMC that would be helpful. Steve Chiswell Unidata User Support >From: Christian Page <address@hidden> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata >Keywords: 200108301331.f7UDVO128340 > >Hi, > >I just modified GEMPAK so that it decodes cloud types in Canadian METAR remark > s. >It seems to work well (see >http://meteocentre.com/analyse/map.php?hour=0&lang=en&map=Montreal >http://meteocentre.com/analyse/map.php?hour=0&lang=en&map=Nord-Est >) > >I tried to follow closely GEMPAK coding-style. >Is Unidata interested in including these modifications for a future GEMPAK >version? > >Christian Page >UQAM > >