This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi all, WHen I look at the file attached by HansPeter (HP GRIB.001) it looks fine to me. The GRIB part can be found after the first 899 bytes. The remaining part (GRIB to 7777, inclusive) is 803521 bytes long, which is as indicated in octets 9 to 16 of Section 0. The users who have been looking at the data have received it via EUMETCast, and also via ftp from me. Maybe some got data from the UMARF, but I don't get to hear about them. I think that as long as a decoder looks through a file and pulls out GRIB (or BUFR) messages before decoding, then it doesn't matter how they are packed into files. Simon Dr Simon Elliott Product Implementation Manager Operations Department EUMETSAT tel: (+49) 6151 807385 fax: (+49) 6151 807304 >>> HansPeter Roesli <address@hidden> 17/11/2006 09:37:39 >>> Hi Simon and Robb After having read Simon's first reaction I got a slight doubt about what I did. Actually, the file Robb is mentioning is not the original file as retrieved from EUMETSAT's archive U-MARF (you find that now attached). The original file is refused right away by IDV. Therefore, I chopped off the ASCII header with an editor and that is the file Robb is using. Might be that my editor changed things inside the GRIB-7777 clause when I was pruning the file. So, Robb please check again with the attached file which has leading bytes (EUMETSAT's ASCII header) before the bytes spelling GRIB. Also, Simon, when you are saying that other centres are not having decoding problems, are they getting the data from EUMETCast/GTS or from U-MARF. I am using exclusively U-MARF retrieved products. Might be there is a problem with archived data? HP Simon Elliott wrote: > Hello Robb, > > HansPeter has asked me to contact you directly as I am responsible for > the generation of the GRIB2 data from EUMETSAT. I am interested to read > about the extra characters you found inside hte message. As I'm sure > you can imagine, we have exchanged the data with other centres using > different software and they have yet to spot this problem. > > I suspect either (i) the GRIB data have been chopped up for > dissemination and not been properly re-assembled into the original > message, or (ii) at some stage the data have been transferred with ASCII > FTP ... this happens quite often. > > If you could send me the file you mention, or make it availabel for FTP > transfer, I would be happy to investigate. > > Regards, > > Simon > > Dr Simon Elliott > Product Implementation Manager > Operations Department > EUMETSAT > tel: (+49) 6151 807385 > fax: (+49) 6151 807304 > > >>>> Robb Kambic <address@hidden> 14/11/2006 22:50:35 >>> > HansPeter, > > i investigated the problem with Grib2 decoder not being able to decode > the > space products, ie > MSG1-SEVI-MSGCLTH-0100-0100-20060102114500.000000000Z-12774_GRIB.grb > > at first it seemed to be a table problem but that's not the case. > the products do not follow the standard Grib encoding, there are > extra characters inserted between the Grib format sections that's the > problem. i had the same problem with the Grib 1 format from some of > the > european centers. i tried the Grib 1 format fix then the decoder was > able to > decode the first 5 sections of the product but then the 6th section > didn't begin at the correct position. at this time, i could some help > in > finding out the format of the product, so i can modify the decoder. i > did a > quick look for the product information but was unable to get the > information > i needed. Could you contact the data provider to get the structure of > the > product? or get a contact person for this product? > > thanks, > robb... > > > > >