This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
hiya, i'm a little confused about how a 1 mg file gets expanded to 1 gig. the usual expansion from grib 1 to netcdf is about 10x, grib 2 can be 40x. i could see a larger file if navigation information is added, but not more than 15x. But Glenn did state the resulting file was only about 3-4 times, that sounds reasonable. Could you point me to a file so i can take a look? robb... > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Glenn Rutledge <address@hidden> > Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:51:47 -0400 > Subject: Re: FW: Re: NCEP North American Reanalysis (fwd) > To: address@hidden > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden > > > Hi Jon, > Just to clarify- we were trying to provide "a service" for users that > converts these data to NetCDF, then compress it. The mg to gb was an > intermediary file that the routines apparently constructs to do the > conversion - then it pares the data into NetCDF with is only about 2- > 4 times bigger. Not several orders of magnitude. > > So- we are now just developing an informational page that points to > Unidata web sites that users can download the utilities to do this > conversion themselves. So- it's just not that bad. Hope this helps. > Glenn > > Jon Goodall wrote: > > > > Russ and Ben, > > We are working with the NCDC to convert NARR reanalysis data from > Grib to netCDF. They reported that initial attempts to convert a 1mb > NARR file in grib resulted in a 1gb NetCDF file. Dr. Madment wanted > me check with you to see if this sounds right. I'm sure it depends on > the specifics of the conversion routine, which Glenn Rutledge would > know. We want to use netCDF to store the NARR data, but can not > justify a factor of 1,000 storage increase. > > Jon > > Jon Goodall > Center for Research in Water Resources > University of Texas at Austin > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "Glenn Rutledge" <address@hidden> > To: address@hidden > Subject: Re: NCEP North American Reanalysis (fwd) > Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:46:05 -0400 > > Hi Jon, > We just developed the capability to do this and find that it will not > be wise for me to include this service for users since it takes a 1mb > file and turns it into a 1gb file! We have a meeting tomorrow to > discuss some alternatives- but did you try using grads-dods to access > in NetCDF? Please see COLA docs for info. > > I'll let you know what we come up with on this. Glenn > > Jon Goodall wrote: > > Hi Glenn, > > I wanted to follow-up on the NARR in netCDF conversion you were > working on a few weeks ago. How's it going? > > Thanks, > Jon Goodall > Center for Research in Water Resources > University of Texas at Austin > > > ________________________________ > > > > Subject: Re: NCEP North American Reanalysis (fwd) > > From: "Glenn Rutledge" <address@hidden> > > Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:46:05 -0400 > > To: address@hidden > Hi Jon, > We just developed the capability to do this and find that it will not > be wise for me to include this service for users since it takes a 1mb > file and turns it into a 1gb file! We have a meeting tomorrow to > discuss some alternatives- but did you try using grads-dods to access > in NetCDF? Please see COLA docs for info. > > I'll let you know what we come up with on this. Glenn > > Jon Goodall wrote: > > Hi Glenn, > > I wanted to follow-up on the NARR in netCDF conversion you were > working on a few weeks ago. How's it going? > > Thanks, > Jon Goodall > Center for Research in Water Resources > University of Texas at Austin > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "Glenn Rutledge" <address@hidden> > To: address@hidden > CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, > address@hidden, address@hidden, > address@hidden, address@hidden, > address@hidden, address@hidden, > address@hidden, address@hidden, > address@hidden, address@hidden > Subject: Re: NCEP North American Reanalysis (fwd) > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:28:12 -0400 > > > ________________________________ > > > > Subject: Re: NCEP North American Reanalysis (fwd) > > From: "Glenn Rutledge" <address@hidden> > > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:28:12 -0400 > > To: address@hidden > Thanks Jon, > I stand corrected- it does work, but for a limited volume only (as in > your example!). The conversion is rather straightforward, and w/o > issues it could be by next week. Glenn > > Jon Goodall wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've been able to download a subset of the NARR data (only > surface-level values from a week at the 3 hour time step) from the > NCDC website using the ftp4u link. It works great and I had no > problems. If we also have the grib2nc conversion, we will be all > set. Glenn, when do you hope to has this conversion available? > > Jon Goodall > Center for Research in Water Resources > University of Texas at Austin > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "Glenn Rutledge" <address@hidden> > To: Steve Worley <address@hidden> > CC: Ben Domenico <address@hidden>, David Maidment > <address@hidden>, Jon Goodall <address@hidden>, > "Dennis P. Lettenmaier" <address@hidden>, support-ldm > <address@hidden>, Martin Benno Blumenthal > <address@hidden>, Don Hooper <address@hidden>, > Roland Schweitzer <address@hidden>, Robb Kambic > <address@hidden>, Sharon Leduc <address@hidden>, > Russell Vose <address@hidden>, Dan Swank <address@hidden> > Subject: Re: NCEP North American Reanalysis (fwd) > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:04:49 -0400 > > > ________________________________ > > > > Subject: Re: NCEP North American Reanalysis (fwd) > > From: "Glenn Rutledge" <address@hidden> > > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:04:49 -0400 > > To: Steve Worley <address@hidden> > Thanks Steve and Ben for your forward. > > We are now ingesting and have avbl the NARR. We have 1987 thru 2003 > (of the 1979-2004) as requested below. NCAR and SDSC will also have > copies. Here at NCDC, Murphy got in the way as I usually have grib > sub-seting capabilities, however the RAID I expected in for this > operation has not yet arrived! I'm told the check is in the mail. To > get around this, the NOMADS team (all 2.5 of us) put together direct > access http to (m)get at the data due to this hardware delay. > > So, users may access the data as per Steve's url below. Use the http > link to get at the data directories. Depending on your internet > connection, it may be a slow process (maybe open 2 ports). > > By next week (or so), please point users to the "ftp4u" capability > that can subset this large (5TB) dataset by parameter space and time > (and by variable). There is dataset documentation also avbl at the > site. > > As I write, we are developing a grib2nc capability for users to > retrieve in NetCDF format. We will also compress the NetCDF for > transmission (GFDL, Kerr) found that these NetCDF files compress very > well. Please let me know your experiences with this site and do try > to subset when that's avbl. Thanks, Glenn > > Steve Worley wrote: > > All, > > North American Regional Reanalysis is just coming available from > two location I know of: > > the NCDC NOMADS server (Glenn's work) at > http://nomads.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access.html#narr_datasets > > and NCAR through the Data Support Section. > We have 1987-2003 archived, but not fully ready for service. However, > if you wish to let us know what you require we might be able to > accomodate your needs without too much problem. Chi-Fan Shih > (address@hidden) can address your further questions about NARR > from NCAR. > > sjw > > > Ben Domenico wrote: > > Hi David, Jon and Dennis, > > Your questions are flattering in terms of the assumed breadth and > depth of knowledge about data collections here at the Unidata Program > Center (UPC), but we should be honest and offer a few clarifications > that will help you find what you are looking for more quickly. > > The main clarification is that the staff at the UPC mainly focuses on > infrastructure for real-time data systems for weather data. I > understand that archived climate information is closely related, but > your questions about the details of specific archived climate datasets > are skirting pretty much at and beyond the edges of our UPC expertise. > Those sorts of questions are better posed to the folk who create and > maintain the climate data archives at places like the NCDC, NCAR, > Lamont-Doherty, and CDC. I plan to send a copy of this note to Glenn > Rutledge at NCDC, Benno Blumenthal at LDEO, Steve Worley at NCAR, and > Don Hooper & Roland Schweitzer at CDC who should be able to help you > find what you need in terms of the North American Reanalysis datasets > -- in particular a netCDF version. > > On the other hand, we do have experience at the UPC with decoders > that transform certain GRIB datasets into netCDF form (indeed with > considerably expanded size) and I'll ask Robb to follow up on that > issue to see if there is a version of that (GRIBTONC) decoder for the > North American Reanalysis data. > > I don't mean to be passing the buck, but there are many groups who > have more detailed expertise than the UPC about archives of climate > datasets. > > --Ben > ****************************************************** > Ben Domenico Unidata Deputy Director > http://my.unidata.ucar.edu P.O. Box 3000 > address@hidden Boulder, CO 80307 > (303)497-8631 FAX: (303)497-8690 > > --On Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:45 PM -0500 David Maidment > <address@hidden> wrote: > > > Robb: > > Dennis Lettenmaier is correct here. What you are pointing us to is > the global NCEP reanalysis, which is on a 2.5 degree grid and not > very informative for the hydrology of the US. What we are seeking > to work with is the reanalysis for North America alone, which is > on a 32km grid and is in Grib format, not netCDF. The global > reanalysis is available in netCDF. > > David > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robb Kambic [mailto:address@hidden] > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 11:25 AM > To: Ben Domenico > Cc: David Maidment; support-ldm > Subject: Re: NCEP North American Reanalysis (fwd) > > > > look at url: > > http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/cdc/data.ncep.reanalysis.html#surface_gauss > > parameters water runoff, soil moisture, etc. these files are in netcdf > so they should be usuable for your analysis. i downloaded a couple of > files and dumped them using ncdump. > > there are proably other hydrologic fluxes data sets that can be found by > searching the web. > > robb... > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Ben Domenico wrote: > > > Hi all, > > The note below from David Maidment asks about getting the NCAR > reanalysis products into netCDF form. Is there something special > about these datasets or would our grib to netcdf decoder work with > them. Regarding the grads part of it, I'm assuming that refers to the > > > > fact that they are available via the GDS protocol, but let me know if > there's more to it than that. > > And how about the CDC archives? I thought they published these data > in netCDF form. > > Thanks. > > -- Ben > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > Date: Thursday, September 30, 2004 8:18 AM -0500 > From: David Maidment <address@hidden> > To: Ben Domenico <address@hidden> > Subject: NCEP North American Reanalysis > > > Ben: > > In CUAHSI HIS, we are thinking that a good "coverage" of hydrologic > fluxes from the atmosphere could be obtained from the NCEP North > American Reanalysis. More info is at > http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/rreanl/ > > It seems like the data are all stored in one of your sister > institutions in Boulder. > > Could you please help us to interpret what the data available are? > > The data are in Grib/Grads format. We have invested a lot of effort > > in > > > working > with netCDF and I don't want Jon Goodall or others in our CUAHSI > > community > > > having to tussle with Grib/Grads. We have another other data formats > already > with GIS, point observations and remote sensing to consider. > > Would it be possible to translate these reanalysis data layers into > netCDF format? > > David > > > ---------- End Forwarded Message ---------- > > > > > ======================================================================== > ======= > Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center > Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric > Research > address@hidden WWW: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ > ======================================================================== > ======= > =============================================================================== Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ ===============================================================================