This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Pete, re: > That is interesting.. I ran an ldmping to idd.unidata.ucar.edu and also > to conduit.ncep.noaa.gov, and the idd.unidata ones were consistantly 0.1 > second or less. OK, but the ldmping packets are very small, so small numbers do not necessarily imply that a lot of data can be transferred. The classic case of this is when there is volume based packet shaping (artificial volume limiting) being done on the upstream side. re: > The ones to conduit.ncep.noaa.gov were mostly 0.09 but every 6th one or > so was 0.35, and every once in a while there was a 4 second one. > Unfortunatlely I closed the window that had them in it so I can't show > exactly what I saw.. Right now ldmping conduit.ncep.noaa.gov is not > returning pings.. ldmping is good for showing that an upstream LDM is running. I would not rely on it meaning that the latencies for products being relayed by the upstream will be low. re: > Our conduit feeds are split. There are 5 feeds, currently > > REQUEST CONDUIT "[05]$" idd.unidata.ucar.edu > REQUEST CONDUIT "[16]$" idd.unidata.ucar.edu > REQUEST CONDUIT "[27]$" idd.unidata.ucar.edu > REQUEST CONDUIT "[38]$" idd.unidata.ucar.edu > REQUEST CONDUIT "[49]$" idd.unidata.ucar.edu OK. You should be redundantly feeding from both NCEP upstream sites, conduit.ncep.noaa.gov and ncepldm4.woc.noaa.gov. You can, of course, also continue your redundant feed REQUESTs to idd.unidata.ucar.edu. NB: if you REQUEST the same feed(s) from more than one upstream, you should make sure that your REQUESTs are identical, or, at least, the union of the REQUESTs is identical. re: > I used to have them split 09, 18, 27, 36, 45 but it seemed to me to go > every 5th product made more sense. Maybe not? This shouldn't make any difference as the sequence numbers are probably distributed uniformly (meaning just as many end with a '0' as end with '1', '2', '3', etc.). re: > Will let you know if I hear any more from the NCEP folks.. I am in contact with Carissa Klemmer of NCEP. They are eager to look into the problem, but they wanted to understand the real-time stats pages better before proceeding. Cheers, Tom -- **************************************************************************** Unidata User Support UCAR Unidata Program (303) 497-8642 P.O. Box 3000 address@hidden Boulder, CO 80307 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unidata HomePage http://www.unidata.ucar.edu **************************************************************************** Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: FAC-765998 Department: Support CONDUIT Priority: Normal Status: Closed