[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[CONDUIT #RFO-442890]: GFS upgrade

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [CONDUIT #RFO-442890]: GFS upgrade
  • Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:29:42 -0700
Hi Carissa,

re:
> I didn't turn it on yet. I can reinsert the data once you give me the go
> ahead. I don't want to break anything, or send it out, if you aren't ready
> yet. Please let me know when you are ready.

I need to get together with our THREDDS guys today so that the test feed
will not interfere with any testing that they may be doing.

FYI: we are planning on REQUESTing the feed from lead.unidata.ucar.edu.

> address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > So with today's 12Z cycle I will start sending the GFS 0.25 data. I am
> > going to send it to ncep-ldm2.boulder.noaa.gov, so you can take that one
> > out for testing. The first file should show up around 1520 UTC. Please let
> > me know if I haven't given you enough time to prepare for this. I meant to
> > give you a heads up on Friday that the changes were approved for today, but
> > Friday was a bad day for us if you hadn't noticed :(
> >
> > Carissa Klemmer
> > NCEP Central Operations
> > Production Management Branch Dataflow Team
> > 301-683-3835
> >
> > address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Carissa,
> >>
> >> re: what do you mean by 'parallel GFS'
> >> > Yes, the GFS parallel I speak of is the 0.25 data. It is not operational
> >> > yet, hence parallel.
> >>
> >> OK.  I just wanted to make sure that we were talking about the same thing.
> >>
> >> re:
> >> > Okay, then we will draft a change request to take one
> >> > of the LDMs and start sending the 0.25 there.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> re:
> >> > Is it fine that we still also
> >> > send all the other data, we would just add the GFS to it?
> >>
> >> Yes, this is probably preferable for testing purposes.
> >>
> >> Thanks again!
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Tom
> >> --
> >>
> >> ****************************************************************************
> >> Unidata User Support                                    UCAR Unidata
> >> Program
> >> (303) 497-8642                                                 P.O. Box
> >> 3000
> >> address@hidden                                   Boulder, CO
> >> 80307
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Unidata HomePage                       http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
> >>
> >> ****************************************************************************
> >>
> >>
> >> Ticket Details
> >> ===================
> >> Ticket ID: RFO-442890
> >> Department: Support CONDUIT
> >> Priority: Normal
> >> Status: Closed
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 

Cheers,

Tom
--
****************************************************************************
Unidata User Support                                    UCAR Unidata Program
(303) 497-8642                                                 P.O. Box 3000
address@hidden                                   Boulder, CO 80307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unidata HomePage                       http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
****************************************************************************


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: RFO-442890
Department: Support CONDUIT
Priority: Normal
Status: Open