This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Agreed here on 13km RAP model - native vertical coordinate with hydrometeors - all things as close to native as possible rather than interpolated either to pressure or eliminating the critical 3D variables. --Greg Thompson, NCAR-RAL On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Gerry Creager wrote: > Becky > > Thanks for getting back to me. We are interested in the 12 km NAM and 13 km > (130 grid) RAP data. If that's possible, it'd be a help. When I first asked > on the LDM list, there was at least one other researcher interested in higher > resolution NAM and RAP. Somehow, I don't think I'd be the only user. > > Appreciate the help, and I fully understand about the delays for new systems > and schedules. > > Regards, > Gerry > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Rebecca Cosgrove <address@hidden> wrote: > Gerry, > I apologize for my delayed response. > Right now we've got a limit on adding new data to CONDUIT until we upgrade > our system here at NCEP. We're in the process of that upgrade right now. > I'll submit your request for additional NAM 12km fields to the User Committee > meeting on the 17th for consideration after the upgrade. If others in the > group would like to see this data, I encourage you to chime in and voice your > desire for this as well. > > For the RAP, we do have 20km and 40km grids for the CONUS available in > CONDUIT. Is there additional RAP data you are interested in? > > Becky Cosgrove > NCEP Central Operations > >> CONDUIT folk >> >> We're working on a project and I'd configured a CONDUIT feed to acquire NAM >> 218 data. My plan was to kick off processing using a PQACT action when the >> last of the needed data arrived. Problem: We get the surface fields, which >> is not sufficient to initialize WRF. Of course, I can go download the data >> from NCEP (in fact, that's what we're now doing) but I'm wondering: Am I the >> only one looking for these data? Is there sufficient bandwidth to allow >> carrying the full NAM 12 km dataset? What's the chances of getting NAM (and, >> for that matter, RAP) added? >> >> Thanks, Gerry >> OU/CIMMS/NSSL >> >> _______________________________________________ >> conduit mailing list >> >> address@hidden >> >> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ > > _______________________________________________ > conduit mailing list > address@hidden > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ _______________________________________________ conduit mailing list address@hidden For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/