Re: TIGGE CONDUIT data

We had looked at them this morning, and had noticed that ldm2 still has 
a latency problem.  We are still working with WOC to hopefully find the 
root cause, and to address ldm2.

-Paula

Doug Schuster wrote:
> Justin,
>
> As an update, we've received complete gens TIGGE datasets through 06Z 
> today.
> CONDUIT latency is also doing quite a bit better since early yesterday:
>
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/iddstats_nc?CONDUIT+idd.unidata.ucar.edu 
>
>
> Doug
>
> On Jun 21, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Justin Cooke wrote:
>
> > Doug,
> >
> > Well this is wonderful news but disconcerting since we do not have a 
> > root cause for the improvement. Lets just hope it sticks.
> >
> > We have archived all the missing GRIB2 sets and will reship them to 
> > you once we are confident in the stability of the CONDUIT feeds.
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > Douglas Schuster wrote:
> > > Hi Justin,
> > >
> > > It appears CONDUIT is back up to speed as
> > > we've received complete gens TIGGE model cycles for 20070621 00z and 
> > > 20070621 06z.
> > >
> > > Here's an update on forecast cycles missing from the TIGGE archive:
> > > 20070513 00z
> > > 20070601 18z
> > > 20070614 18z - 20070620 18z
> > >
> > > Doug