Re: CONDUIT feed timing

Thanks Steve,

I'll check out the products in the queue ...

FYI ... GFS came in timely again today. (almost an hour earlier than what we had been 
seeing over the past few weeks.)





Jerry



Steve Chiswell wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> I note that dcarchive.ssec.wisc.edu has redundant feed requests:
> http://my.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/iddstats_topo_nc?CONDUIT+dcarchive.ssec.wisc.edu
> so, if the product were scoured out of your queue, you could receive it
> again from the other route with the same checksum.
>
> The pqmon output will show the oldest product in your queue (use the -i
> option to output at periodic intervals. If your queue size is smaller
> than what you wan hold under normal lateny conditions, then you might
> receive a product twice. Eg, if pqmon showed that your oldest product
> was 1800 seconds old, and you had a latency greater than 1800 seconds,
> then you could accept the product when offered it from the other
> upstream host (up to your rpc.ldmd maxtime, eg 3600 seconds by default
> which is more strictly enforced in LDM 6.1).
>
> Steve Chiswell
> Unidata User Support
>
>
> On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 14:04, Jerrold Robaidek wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > We did receivie the 18Z GFS 1 degree grib files more timely (more than 30 minutes earlier 
> > than in the recent past)
> >
> > However, we did notice that we had some duplicate grib messages being received.
> >
> >
> >
> > here is a portion of wgrib output
> >
> > 563:46852448:d=05010412:SPFH:kpds5=51:kpds6=105:kpds7=2:TR=10:P1=0:P2=0:TimeU=1:2 m above 
> > gnd:anl:NAve=0
> > 564:46950272:d=05010412:SPFH:kpds5=51:kpds6=105:kpds7=2:TR=10:P1=0:P2=0:TimeU=1:2 m above 
> > gnd:anl:NAve=0
> > 565:47048096:d=05010412:PRES:kpds5=1:kpds6=243:kpds7=0:TR=10:P1=0:P2=0:TimeU=1:convect-cld 
> > top:anl:NAve=0
> > 566:47069774:d=05010412:PRES:kpds5=1:kpds6=243:kpds7=0:TR=10:P1=0:P2=0:TimeU=1:convect-cld 
> > top:anl:NAve=0
> > 567:47091452:d=05010412:5WAVA:kpds5=230:kpds6=100:kpds7=500:TR=10:P1=0:P2=0:TimeU=1:500 
> > mb:anl:NAve=0
> > 568:47197420:d=05010412:5WAVA:kpds5=230:kpds6=100:kpds7=500:TR=10:P1=0:P2=0:TimeU=1:500 
> > mb:anl:NAve=0
> >
> > note: 567 and 568 have the same checksum
> >
> > dcarchive{oper}:cksum 567.out
> > 3643681194 105968 567.out
> > dcarchive{oper}:cksum 568.out
> > 3643681194 105968 568.out
> >
> >
> > Shouldn't one of these not have come through?
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > Steve Chiswell wrote:
> >
> > > Jerry,
> > >
> > > Yesterday at 1830Z we implemented a parallel queueing scheme at the
> > > NWS that we hope will improve the timeliness of data being ingected into
> > > the CONDUIT data stream. Any feedback you can provide on how
> > > this affects your reception would be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Since data will be inserted in parallel, you will notice that multiple 
> > > model runds and forecast times will probably be interspersed where
> > > previously they had been serialized.
> > >
> > > I watched the 00Z GFS last night, and the posting gap between f084 and
> > > f132 was matched on the FTP server at 0422Z and later at 0509Z, the
> > > other grids were posted to the NWS servers, so all appears to be
> > > behaving correctly on this end.
> > >
> > > Steve Chiswell
> > > Unidata User Support


--
Jerrold Robaidek                       Email:  address@hidden
SSEC Data Center                       Phone: (608) 262-6025
University of Wisconsin                Fax: (608) 263-6738
Madison, Wisconsin