Re: codiac archive types

HI Liz, 

I think there was some confusion here.

Some of the other tapes were netCDF tapes, but these were ordered from
Embry-Riddle and they obviously have no use for them...

So we gave them the "standard" version of the cases they misordered.

However, it does seem as if we are missing 19 OKC tornado...were we adding
datasets to this? Otherwise I cannot understand why both the original
AND back-up are missing..

I will continue poking around here as well.

Thanks,


-Jeff
________________________________________      ______________________

On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Elizabeth Page wrote:

> Yuan,
> 
> This is interesting...I was sure it was probably an NWS person. I will
> look around Dolores' office and see if I can find the tapes. If not, I can
> send you a copy of case 19. If you could track down what the other tapes
> are, that would be great.
> 
> Thanks,
> Liz
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Yuan Ho wrote:
> 
> > Elizabeth Page wrote:
> >
> > >Yuan,
> > >
> > >We have some of the AWIPS versions of the cases. Can you tell me who is
> > >ordering them?
> > >
> > >Liz
> > >
> > >On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Yuan Ho wrote:
> > >
> > >>Liz,
> > >>         We try to locate three achive types with the number: 1030,
> > >>1034, and 1036. The first 1030 type it is for case 19, I am not sure for
> > >>the other two. Do you have these three types there? Jeff and Ted told me
> > >>something about rewriting the types last year may involved these three
> > >>types. Please let me know since someone is ordering these types.
> > >>
> > >>Yuan
> > >>
> > >
> > Liz,
> >          Dr. Chris Herbster from Applied Aviation Sciences ordered these
> > types.
> >
> > Yuan
> >
> >
> 
>