[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20010606: COMET Case Study 34: NJ Floods

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 20010606: COMET Case Study 34: NJ Floods
  • Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:02:45 -0600 (MDT)
Hi Alan, 

Your comments are appreciated.

I will pass this along to the folks at COMET who compile the data for
these casestudies. Optimally, we strive to offer the best data products
available for examining these cases, but sometimes there are data voids,
or perhaps an oversight. We will examine the possibility of including the 
higher resolution 1km  VIS imagery to this casestudy.

Thank you for visting the COMET Case Study Library,

-Jeff
____________________________                  _____________________
Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden
Unidata Support                               PH:303-497-8676 
NWS-COMET Case Study Library                  FX:303-497-8690
University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000
________________________________________      ______________________

On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Unidata Support wrote:

> 
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> >To: address@hidden
> >From: "Alan Cope" <address@hidden>
> >Subject: COMET Case Study 34: NJ Floods
> >Organization: DOC/NOAA/NWS - National Weather Service
> >Keywords: 200106071922.f57JMap24374
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I recently ordered the COMET Case Study 34 - the New Jersey
> flood case.  I appreciate your putting these data together and
> making them available to field offices.
> 
> However, may I suggest that it would be useful to include
> some higher resolution, i.e., 1-km,  Visible satellite data.  The
> 4-km VIS data on the tape covers almost the entire NH, and
> looks very blocky when zoomed in to the area of interest
> (northern NJ).  Also, more frequent imagery, i.e., every 15 min
> vs once per hour, would be helpful.
> 
> If it's too late for this case, maybe in futures cases.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Al Cope
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  Al Cope                                         National Weather
> Service
>  Science and Operations Officer        Forecast Office (NWSFO PHI)
>  address@hidden                   732 Woodlane Road
>  (609) 261-6602 x 224                 Mt. Holly, NJ   08060
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
> 
>