[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 20000605: GOES 9 imagery for COMET_case_008
- Subject: Re: 20000605: GOES 9 imagery for COMET_case_008
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:01:30 -0600 (MDT)
>Date:20000605
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>Keywords: 200006050635.e556ZQT18463 McIDAS area files conversion
Arthur,
I believe this URL should answer most if not all of your questions.
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/mug/prog_man/Current/progman-117.HTML#13797
PLease write back if you have any further questions, and thank you for
using the COMET Case Study Library.
-Jeff
__________
Jeff Weber
Unidata/NWS-COMET Case Study Library
University Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden
PH:303-497-8676
URL--http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber
________________________________________________
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Unidata Support wrote:
>
> ------- Forwarded Message
>
> >To: address@hidden
> >From: "Arthur Henkel" <address@hidden>
> >Subject: GOES 9 imagery for COMET_case_008
> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata
> >Keywords: 200006050635.e556ZQT18463
>
> Hello:
>
> Thanks for making the satellite data for the various COMET case studies
> public. I downloaded the imagery for the Dec 96/Jan 97 CA flood event (case
> study 008) and have been trying to understand the McIDAS format. I was
> hoping that you could answer a few questions concerning that format that
> might help me in successfully displaying the imagery (of most interest
> initially, is the IR band).
>
> 1) Is the data already projected into a map coordinate system? If so, what
> are the corner/center coordinates? (pixel size?) I have been trying to view
> the imagery in the commercial package ENVI; ENVI apparently knows nothing
> about how to read the AREA or NAV blocks of the McIDAS files, other than
> allowing the user to view the integer/character data manually.
>
> 2) Are there any simple, stand-alone utilities available to assist in
> navigating/georeferencing the images outside of the McIDAS software
> environement?... perhaps converting to other more readily available formats
> (ERDAS, ESRI's formats, etc?)
>
> 3) Any other help/hints that you can provide about the geometric/radiometric
> corrections that have been made to this data would be appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Arthur F. Henkel
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>
>