This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Rob, > Hope your recovering! I am feeling better. Thanks. > Here is what I propose to initially suggest to the IOOS DIF group on how > we should be adding degC and degF to our unitsOfMeasureDictionary.xml. > Trying to hunt down definitions for all this stuff didn't get me vary > far. All roads seem to lead back to: > > http://vast.uah.edu/downloads/sensorML/v1.0/xmlDoc/SensorML_UnitDefinition.html > > or > > ams_csml.pdf has a curious example writeup (Page 6: Figure 4) > > Most items were straight forward. The only one that would allow me to > place all the available UDUNITS2 aliases is gml:name. This raises a > quandary about how these get linked up to the SOS OBSERVEDPROPERTIES. > That is more our problem. > > Does the proposed additions look to be proper representation of items > from the udunits2 database? I welcome any/all suggestions. There are some things about the UDUNITS-2 package that might affect your effort (you're in a better position to judge that I am). They are: 1. The UDUNITS-2 package makes a distinction between unit names and unit symbols. For names, comparisons are case-insensitive; whereas they are case-sensitive for symbols. 2. The UDUNITS-2 package allows underscores to be replaced with non- breaking spaces so that, for example, the HTML strings "degrees_Celsius" and "degrees Celsius" would both map to the same unit (after the HTML was converted to UTF-8). Otherwise, what you have looks OK to me, but you have to understand that I don't know GML. > The goal is to make sure that this SOS service (and data flowing through > it) honors some sort of units standard. If it does, then we already have > some nice infrastructure to do some nice conversions. > > There may be lots of iterations on this. Once I propose this to the > group, the way units are represented might get modified. I'd rather beat > that bees nest now before things get to the point where it is too late. > > If the structure is changed, I'll be back with different items to look at. > > Thanks, > Rob Regards, Steve Emmerson Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: KBN-302240 Department: Support UDUNITS Priority: Normal Status: Closed