[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[UDUNITS #KBN-302240]: proposed celsius/fahrenheit additions to IOOS DIF unitsOfMeasureDictionary.xml
- Subject: [UDUNITS #KBN-302240]: proposed celsius/fahrenheit additions to IOOS DIF unitsOfMeasureDictionary.xml
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:45:04 -0600
Rob,
> Hope your recovering!
I am feeling better. Thanks.
> Here is what I propose to initially suggest to the IOOS DIF group on how
> we should be adding degC and degF to our unitsOfMeasureDictionary.xml.
> Trying to hunt down definitions for all this stuff didn't get me vary
> far. All roads seem to lead back to:
>
> http://vast.uah.edu/downloads/sensorML/v1.0/xmlDoc/SensorML_UnitDefinition.html
>
> or
>
> ams_csml.pdf has a curious example writeup (Page 6: Figure 4)
>
> Most items were straight forward. The only one that would allow me to
> place all the available UDUNITS2 aliases is gml:name. This raises a
> quandary about how these get linked up to the SOS OBSERVEDPROPERTIES.
> That is more our problem.
>
> Does the proposed additions look to be proper representation of items
> from the udunits2 database? I welcome any/all suggestions.
There are some things about the UDUNITS-2 package that might affect
your effort (you're in a better position to judge that I am). They
are:
1. The UDUNITS-2 package makes a distinction between unit
names and unit symbols. For names, comparisons are case-insensitive;
whereas they are case-sensitive for symbols.
2. The UDUNITS-2 package allows underscores to be replaced with non-
breaking spaces so that, for example, the HTML strings "degrees_Celsius"
and "degrees Celsius" would both map to the same unit (after the
HTML was converted to UTF-8).
Otherwise, what you have looks OK to me, but you have to understand that
I don't know GML.
> The goal is to make sure that this SOS service (and data flowing through
> it) honors some sort of units standard. If it does, then we already have
> some nice infrastructure to do some nice conversions.
>
> There may be lots of iterations on this. Once I propose this to the
> group, the way units are represented might get modified. I'd rather beat
> that bees nest now before things get to the point where it is too late.
>
> If the structure is changed, I'll be back with different items to look at.
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: KBN-302240
Department: Support UDUNITS
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed