This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Sue, > Well, any time within a couple of weeks should be fine. > If it takes more I might revert back and try my luck with udunits. > > Is it the intention of udunits2 to be able to parse and resolve > all CF-1.0 compliant time strings? Or is the whole CF compliance > issue not a goal or part of the package? The UDUNITS-2 package is designed to be compatible with the original UDUNITS package at the unit string level. Therefore, the UDUNITS-2 package should correctly parse every valid unit specification that the UDUNITS package parses. This should include the CF conventions on unit strings. > Also, is udunits2 meant to replace udunits? ie. best for > developers to move on with the new stuff or are these really > diff packages? The API-s of the two packages have some overlap but are really different API-s (the UDUNITS-2 API is larger). The UDUNITS-2 package is meant to replace the UDUNITS package. Regards, Steve Emmerson Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: JLQ-522131 Department: Support UDUNITS Priority: Normal Status: Closed