[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 19991108: Problems with udunits.dat: assay_ton
- Subject: Re: 19991108: Problems with udunits.dat: assay_ton
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 15:46:26 -0700
Randy,
>Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 17:38:30 -0500 (EST)
>From: Randy Zagar <address@hidden>
>Organization: University of Delaware
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: Re: 19991108: Problems with udunits.dat: assay_ton
>Keywords: 199911082120.OAA14215
In the above message, you wrote:
> If *I* need to talk to NIST to fix their publication, I will...
> But I had assumed that someone on your end would handle that
> since it should be clearly obvious that anything called a 'ton'
> would be significantly heavier than 1.03 avoirdupois_ounces
I'm afraid that it's not clearly obvious to me that anything with "ton"
in its name would be significantly heavier than 1.03 avoirdupois_ounces
(and I've been dealing with units and their conversions for several
years now).
> I have already sent e-mail to the author requesting additional
> information. It's either going to end up being a NIST typo or
> a fundamental misunderstanding on my part.
Please be sure to ask your author for a reference.
--------
Steve Emmerson <http://www.unidata.ucar.edu>