This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
I sure agree about Word and PP -- that's why I try to use StarOffice for such things. Just for grins, I opened Chris' Word file in SO and then just saved it as HTML -- the result is at: http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~tomw/wiki/wiki.html The HTML is not too onerous. But, actually, I was hoping to promote document preparation in HTML. Just as you, I find converting between formats to often produces "interesting" results, whereas simple HTML is nowadays pretty universal. Now if I could only convince NSF/Fastlane (although I see that PDF is not the only format available these days...HTML still is not). [Although I note this is the same line of thinking that caused me to speak out about "point data" at the meeting, so maybe I already made my point... ;-] tom On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ben Domenico wrote: > The only problem I have with HTML is with the particular flavor generated > by Microsoft Word and PowerPoint. Actually the newer (Mac) version seems > to do a better job, but Word 2000 generates impenetrable HTML. Those are > the cases where we prefer to create PDFs. We're looking into whether Word > XP does a better job of creating web pages. > -- Tom Whittaker University of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science and Eng. Center ph: 608.262.2759