Hi David:
I had a look at this again. I changed HdfEosModisConvention to use a 1D instead of a scalar time coordinate.
However, joinExisting isnt working because the dataset needs to be "enhanced" (with HdfEosModisConvention) first, before the time coordinate is available. Currently joinExisting aggregation doesnt do that.
I can probably hack that in. Really I want to get the GRID feature collection working, but thats going to be a few months. Aggregation is old and crufty.
Anyway, Ill let you know if i can get "enhanced" working.
John
On 3/20/2013 7:50 AM, Blodgett, David wrote:
Morning John,
I pulled down the latest thredds war and have been testing a few things
out. Did you get temporal aggregation working on the structured data at
all? Any hints on how to structure the ncml for that?
Looks like the spatial stuff is working. Fantastic.
Thanks!
- Dave
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Blodgett, David <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
OK, we'll keep an eye out for the release, thanks so much John!
No worries on the aggregation, the tiles are big enough that I think
we can deal without aggregation.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:43 AM, John Caron <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
On 3/1/2013 12:03 PM, Blodgett, David wrote:
John,
Really happy you added this stuff in, what's your plan for
releasing it?
going to try to release 4.3.16 in next week or two.
You think there's any chance that tiled aggregation will work?
im reluctant to recommend using whats there currently. But doing
it right is a challenge and wont be done soon.
<mailto:address@hidden> <address@hiddenphone: 605-594-2723 <tel:605-594-2723>
<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
Yes the tiling scheme is consistent for all the MODIS tiles.
Thanks,
Jason Werpy
Enterprise Architect
Information Dynamics
USGS/EROS
Sioux Falls, SD 57198
cell: 605-690-3576 <tel:605-690-3576>
fax: 605-594-2530 <tel:605-594-2530>
address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden><address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
NOTICE: This email may contain confidential, proprietary,
or competition
sensitive bid or proposal procurement
information. Unauthorized
disclosure of this information may carry
criminal penalties as set forth
in the Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C. 423, as
amended. Further,
the unauthorized disclosure of certain
commercial information by civil
servants may result in fines or imprisonment under the
Trade Secrets Act
(18 U.S.C. 1905). If you have received this information in
error, please
delete it, including all copies, and notify the sender of
the error
immediately.
On Feb 26, 2013, at 8:26 AM, "Blodgett, David"
In this case, the data is 16 day from about 2000 to<address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
present. So, on the order of 275 time steps. There are
daily products and annual products though, in wich case,
we are looking 12 to 4000+ time steps.
Jason, is the tile scheme you sent over used for all the
different resolutions? Looking at a few of them it looks
like that is the case.
- Dave
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:48 AM, John Caron
wrote:
Heres an image of this file.
questions about aggregations: how many time steps
will be in each aggregation ? how many different
aggregations (tiles?) will you serve?
On 2/24/2013 6:55 PM, David Blodgett wrote:
Sweet, thanks John. There was data in the tile,
but was hard to find... BORING, I know. Sorry
about that.
Here's a tile over the great lakes to give you a
coast to compare locations to.
http://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/MOLT/MOD13Q1.005/2000.03.05/BROWSE.MOD13A1.A2000065.h11v04.005.2008238024700.1.jpg
http://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/MOLT/MOD13Q1.005/2000.03.05/MOD13Q1.A2000065.h11v04.005.2008238031620.hdf
http://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/MOLT/MOD13Q1.005/2000.03.05/MOD13Q1.A2000065.h11v04.005.2008238031620.hdf.xml
- Dave
On Feb 24, 2013, at 6:33 PM, John Caron wrote:
Hi:
Im hacking away at this, but the datafiles i
downloaded _seem_ to have nothing but missing
values. Or im doing something wrong. Can you
send me a file that you know has real data in
it. thanks
John
On 2/24/2013 9:22 AM, David Blodgett wrote:
Hi John,
Actually, I was assuming that the
sinusoidal projection was in there, doh!
That was based on gdal_translate creating
a geotiff with this projection info:
PROJCS["unnamed",
GEOGCS["Unknown datum based upon the
custom spheroid",
DATUM["Not_specified_based_on_custom_spheroid",
SPHEROID["Custom
spheroid",6371007.181,0]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],
UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]],
PROJECTION["Sinusoidal"],
PARAMETER["longitude_of_center",0],
PARAMETER["false_easting",0],
PARAMETER["false_northing",0],
UNIT["metre",1,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]]]
There's a georeferencing section here
(http://www.gdal.org/frmt_hdf4.html) that
has a bit more info about gdal's
implementation. Might be something
helpful there? Looks like the ODL text
you point to is where its coming from.
4 and 5 are questions for Jason and maybe
Jordan. Guys?
- Dave
On Feb 23, 2013, at 1:22 PM, John Caron
wrote:
On 2/22/2013 2:07 PM, David Blodgett
wrote:
Welcome back John. Hope you had a
good trip!
thanks!
I actually just spent a bunch of
time with this the other day and have
been meaning to summarize what
I'm finding.
The first issue we are running
into is your #1 below. In this
case there
is an external xml file that
contains a lot of metadata, including
information about the projection
(sinusoidal), which is currently
unsupported by NetCDF-Java?
1) where do you get this xml file?
2) im looking at
MOD13Q1.A2000065.h00v08.005.2008238080422.hdf
MOD13Q1.A2000065.h00v08.005.2008238080422.hdf.xml
in your union subdirectory. The xml
file does not seem to have projection
info in it.
3) the internal ODL text
(StructMetadata) has
...
UpperLeftPointMtrs=(-20015109.354000,1111950.519667)
LowerRightMtrs=(-18903158.834333,-0.000000)
Projection=GCTP_SNSOID
ProjParams=(6371007.181000,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)
SphereCode=-1
...
which may be enough to calculate the
lat/lon values. Since this is the
best choice, lets investigate it
before we go down any other paths.
4) Can anyone track down the code in
the hyrax handler that does this? Or
does the hyrax handler actually link
in the hds-eos libraries ??
5) how confident are you that all the
files that you want to aggregate have
the same lat/lon geolocation ?
John