[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20041217: that pesky seam when combining images with IMGREMAP (cont.)

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: 20041217: that pesky seam when combining images with IMGREMAP (cont.)
  • Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:43:59 -0700
>From: Owen Cooper <address@hidden>
>Organization: Aeronomy Laboratory/NOAA
>Keywords: 200412151752.iBFHqalI029160 McIDAS IMGREMAP MERC MERGE

Hi Owen,

>Thanks for looking into this. It looks like Jennie Moody has the same 
>problem when she makes her alterred water vapor images, see for example:
>http://windfall.evsc.virginia.edu/~mcuser/webpage/satimgs/pcawv/nat67awv.gif

Jennie's image(s) look like they are also using a conical projection
(Polar Stereographic?).  Since the composites made from GOES-West and
GOES-East on top of a rotated METEOSAT image do not have the slit of
missing element values, I have to assume that it has something to do
with remapping using conic projections.

BTW, I submitted an inquiry about this yesterday evening.  We'll see if
SSEC can come up with a workaround.

Cheers,

Tom
--
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the
Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available
through the web.  If you do not want to have your interactions made
available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.