This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: "Fingerhut, William A" <address@hidden> >Organization: Lyndon State >Keywords: 200207311741.g6VHfM921120 McIDAS-X 7.8 RAOBCON PTCON Bill, >As I upgrade scripts to 7.8, my code that creates grids of >THAE are still using UCC. UCC does what I want. So I am safe >as long as UCC is available, however, I recall that UCC is >scheduled to be sunset in 7.9 . >And, I don't know if it is in 2002? >What is the status of UCC ? Two things here: 1) SSEC changed the version numbering scheme. What was going to be v7.9 is now v2002. All releasees from here on out will be named using the year of release and a single letter (e.g., 'a', 'b', etc.) indicating an addendum. The current release is v2002 and the first addendum will be v2002a. 2) UC, UCC, etc. (the MDX macros) are not built in Unidata McIDAS v2002. The code, however, is still in the distribution so that folks that really need the executables will still have them. Also, the install for v2002 does not remove any of those executables (e.g., uc.k, ucc.k, etc.) from the installation 'bin' directory. So, users that are upgrading from v7.x will still have the v7.x executables available (along with .hlp files in ~mcidas/help). Folks doing brand new installations will not have the executables since they won't exist in the 'bin' directory. The can, however, build and install those executables by running 'make sunset' and then 'make install.sunset' during the build process. One last thing, I took a look at the code in PTCON that sets up the header information for gridded data that will be put in the output GRID file, and I think I understand what is going on. "Simple" gridded fields, those from primary variables, do get all information put into output GRID files. You can verify this by running RAOBCON for things like Z, T, etc. "Complex" variables, those calculated from primary variables do not get their grid headers correctly filled out. The test that prevents this from happening will have to be refined to only exclude those derived parameters for which a level doesn't make sense (like the difference between two levels). I will work on trying to fix the problem after the end of my workshop. Tom