This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: Dee Wade <address@hidden> >Organization: SSEC >Keywords: 200205031531.g43FVta06814 McIDAS SFCMG Dee, >Glad to hear that you agree TYPE= should be documented and supported in >SFCMG. Our only concern is that its options are inconsistent with those >in SFCRPT (which has TYPE=ALL/H/S with a default of ALL). Sounds good. >Therefore, what we'd like to do for this upgrade is document only the >TYPE=ALL option in SFCMG, then, after the upgrade, change it from >TYPE=ALL/STD to TYPE=ALL/H/S so it's consistent with SFCRPT. >Does that sound ok to you? OK. I would argue (small point), however, that TYPE=H for SYNOPTIC reports is a misnomer given that the reports do not come out every hour. >Also, if we make that change, do you think >the default should be changed from "H" to "ALL"? It seems like the default needs to be TYPE=H for continuity reasons (i.e., the default now is to plot standard obs only). >Our testers were >somewhat divided because while ALL is better for getting more detail in >the temp, dewpt and pressure traces, it often makes the data near the >top (cloud, wind, wx and vis) unreadable. I agree with this observation: the temperature and pressure traces are better, but the cloud cover, visibility, etc. can be cluttered. I typically do a "normal" plot and then redo the plot to TYPE=ALL when there is interesting weather going on. I think that the code change to TYPE=ALL/H/S could be made immediately with little effort and not impact users expectations if the default were TYPE=H. The documentation in the User's Guide could be left till later given the late date. Tom