This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: weather <address@hidden> >Organization: NMSU/NSBF >Keywords: 199909242206.QAA23500 McIDAS-XCD DMGRID AVN grid missing SC5.0 Robert, Well, the 12 Z AVN run is in, and the message is much the same as it was for the 0 Z run except that I am including numbers from a different Sun SPARC where dmgrid.k was compiled using SC5.0: machine dataset #MERC #PS Total OSystem Compilers --------------+---------------+------+------+------+--------+--------- adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.39 1587 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.39 1587 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.39 1587 SPARC SC4.2 stratus.al RTGRIDS/AVN.39 1587 SPARC SC5.0 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.39 1587 SPARC SC5.0 adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.49 1016 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.49 1016 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.49 1016 SPARC SC4.2 stratus.al RTGRIDS/AVN.49 1016 SPARC SC5.0 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.49 1016 SPARC SC5.0 adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.59 773 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.59 773 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.59 773 SPARC SC4.2 stratus.al RTGRIDS/AVN.59 773 SPARC SC5.0 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.59 638 SPARC SC5.0 I decided to use NMCAMT to look at all of the realtime GRID files to see what grids might be incomplete. Here is the comparison between adde.unidata and psnldm.nsbf: /home/mcidas/upcworkdata% nmcamt.k FORM=ALL GridF Grid Parm Level RT VT Mod location nr nc received sectors 5149 260 T 2 0 108 MRF 18049459 73 73 084435 |xx*x| total number of grids= 1865 total number of partial grids= 1 nmcamt.k: done /export/home/mcidas/workdata% nmcamt.k FORM=ALL GridF Grid Parm Level RT VT Mod location nr nc received sectors 5149 260 T 2 0 108 MRF 22513647 73 73 091122 |xx*x| 5419 484 Z 150 0 36 AVN 5071922 145 289 051912 |xxxx****| 5419 634 ABV 500 0 42 AVN 9656136 145 289 052225 |xxxx****| 5419 768 V 700 0 48 AVN 11594018 145 289 052338 |xxx*xxx*| 5419 769 V 850 0 48 AVN 11585726 145 289 052338 |****x**x| 5009 246 V 850 0 72 UKMT 5082369 145 289 051912 |*xxxxxxx| 5009 247 T 850 0 30 UKMT 4838395 145 289 051911 |*****x**| 5009 248 T 100 0 60 UKMT 5086516 145 289 051912 |x*******| 5009 249 V 400 0 72 UKMT 5090663 145 289 051912 |x*******| 5009 251 T 700 0 30 UKMT 5162616 145 289 051922 |xxxx****| 5009 275 W 700 0 48 UKMT 11454550 145 289 052327 |*xxxxxxx| 5009 277 T 150 0 30 UKMT 12165513 145 289 052350 |xxxx****| 5009 278 U 200 0 60 UKMT 11938110 145 289 052349 |xxxx****| 5009 292 U 300 0 30 UKMT 19903989 145 289 052909 |*****xx*| 5009 293 V 850 0 60 UKMT 19908569 145 289 052909 |*****xx*| 5009 294 U SFC 0 48 UKMT 20723479 145 289 052940 |xxxxx***| 5009 296 U 250 0 30 UKMT 20842191 145 289 052950 |xxxx****| 5009 301 V 250 0 60 UKMT 23189280 145 289 053056 |*****xxx| 5009 922 U 850 12 60 UKMT 24743202 145 289 173114 |*xx*xxxx| 5009 923 U 150 12 42 UKMT 24738508 145 289 173114 |*****xx*| 5009 924 V 150 12 42 UKMT 24798317 145 289 173234 |x**x****| total number of grids= 38069 total number of partial grids= 21 nmcamt.k: done These listings show that there were a lot more incomplete grids on psnldm than on adde.unidata. The times of the incomplete grids also are clustered around 5:20 Z and 17:30 Z. These are the times that the AVN model grids should be streaming in on the IDD. Working on a hypothesis that there is still something wrong with your copy of dmgrid.k, I decided to run a test. Since the UVa machine is using a version of dmgrid.k that was built with SC4.2 compilers, I decided to check out more thoroughly the new machine I included in the list above: stratus.al. Here is what I found: stratus.al: uname -a SunOS cumulus 5.7 Generic_106541-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise f77 -V f77: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 99/09/16 FORTRAN 77 5.0 patch 107596-03 Usage: f77 [ options ] files. Use 'f77 -flags' for details psnldm: uname -a SunOS psnldm 5.7 Generic_106541-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-Engine f77 -V f77: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 99/07/22 FORTRAN 77 5.0 patch 107596-02 Apparently, the patch level for Fortran on stratus.al is newer than the one on psnldm. I have no idea if this is significant or not. I FTPed the copy of dmgrid.k that is running on stratus.al to psnldm and then did some comparisons: /export/home/mcidas% ls -l dmgrid.k -rwxrwxr-x 1 mcidas staff 351088 Apr 28 21:34 dmgrid.k* /export/home/mcidas% ls -l bin/dmgrid.k -rwxrwxr-x 2 mcidas staff 350860 Apr 28 01:58 bin/dmgrid.k* You can see that the one built on psnldm is smaller than the one built on stratus.al. Again, I don't know if this means anything or not, but it is something at least. Since I havn't heard back from you on what you would like to try on psnldm, I decided to see if the copy of dmgrid.k that I FTPed would do better at decoding grids than the natively built one. I hope that you don't mind. We will have to wait until the next batch of AVN grids arrives to see if the stratus.al copy of dmgrid.k does better than yours. I will check in later to see... Tom >From address@hidden Fri Apr 28 16:10:55 2000 >Subject: 20000428: update on 17 April McIDAS bugfix and AVN 12Z run (cont.) >Thanks for checking into that Tom. Do to the machine whatver you think >is necessary. I appreciate you looking into this. I will get the >latest SC5.0 patch and put it on psnldm. >BTW psnldm is now being fed by wxmcidas. This was not the case until >this morning. >Robert >NSBF Meteorology >From address@hidden Fri Apr 28 16:20:10 2000 >I think I see the problem. I was getting RECLASS statements in my >ldmd.log when these partial grids occurred. My usual problems. >Is a T1 really not a fat enough pipe? Does everyone else have >multiple T1's or T3's? The other problem is the routing to any feed >I have tried is always circuitous. So it looks like it is decoding >correctly. Maybe I will get a clean feed tonight and will see for sure. >Robert >NSBF Meteorology