[LDM #NFA-100528]: SBN Channel Alignment Question

Mike - well, I will admit I am a little disappointed by some of your findings. 
And the need to address will be sometime after Monday, but there are some 
errors in the coding:

FTTN41 is definitely a TAF, which should be coded IDS|DDPLUS.

IUPT02 should be a BUFR, and thus HDS.  Or profiler . . . I will need to 
capture one.

I knew the Redbook was coded incorrectly - it actually should be NGRAPH, but am 
not surprised it is HDS.

GRIB2 should always be NGRID, but there are a few on NMC that get a feedtype of 
HDS . . . shouldn't but do.

To answer your question, we may need to do a thorough analysis in near 
real-time with data on Monday, and make adjustments.  Folks may see a hit on 
bandwidth usage, and it is unfortunate . . . but I completely agree with the 
philosophy of the data realignment, we may some pains for a short period.  
Sorry I don't have more, but I do think using the subset filters instead of ANY 
will help a little.

-
Stonie Cooper, PhD
Software Engineer III
NSF Unidata Program Center
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
I acknowledge that the land I live and work on is the traditional territory of 
The Pawnee, The Omaha, and The Otoe.

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: NFA-100528
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Open
===================
NOTE: All email exchanges with NSF Unidata User Support are recorded in the 
Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the 
web.  If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, 
you must let us know in each email you send to us.