[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[LDM #WLE-664327]: GEMPAK support

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [LDM #WLE-664327]: GEMPAK support
  • Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:52:16 -0700
Tom,

> So, what Kevin did works, but the question is why his specifying
> the fully qualified pathname for the same FILE action did not.

I agree. That's why I indicated there might be some other problem.

> I recall that one or two other users reported the same kind of
> thing (fully qualified pathnames in FILE actions not being
> processed properly), so when Kevin reported his problem, I got
> suspicious that something else is going on.
> 
> Question:
> 
> - what would be the best way to test to see if there is something
> unexpected going on?

Is Shemp still active? It does a lot of filing and could be used for testing if
it's still available.

> - I have never used the '-log' option on FILE.  Could the log message
> shed some light on what may have been happening on Kevin's machine?

I believe the "-log" option will log the pathname of the output file.

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: WLE-664327
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed
===================
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata 
inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web.  If 
you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must 
let us know in each email you send to us.