[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[LDM #TBZ-761980]: memory leak?
- Subject: [LDM #TBZ-761980]: memory leak?
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:32:48 -0600
Bruce,
> This might work better for you. PID 30567 is the ldmd process that is
> increasing its memory usage.
>
> Bruce
>
> ps -aux | grep ldm
> Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See
> /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ
> root 30316 0.0 0.1 96516 3584 ? Ss 20:25 0:00 sshd:
> ldm [priv]
> ldm 30340 0.0 0.0 96516 1800 ? S 20:25 0:00 sshd:
> ldm@pts/0
> ldm 30342 0.0 0.0 10840 1568 pts/0 Ss 20:25 0:00 -bash
> ldm 30563 0.0 0.0 15852 1260 ? Ss 20:26 0:00 ldmd -I
> 0.0.0.0 -P 388 -M 256 -m 3600 -o 3600 -q
> /usr/local/ldm/var/queues/ldm.pq /usr/local/ldm/etc/ldmd.conf
> ldm 30565 0.1 0.2 766340 5144 ? S 20:26 0:00 pqact
> ldm 30566 0.2 0.2 766292 5100 ? S 20:26 0:00 rtstats
> -h rtstats.unidata.ucar.edu
> ldm 30567 1.1 0.8 773176 16976 ? S 20:26 0:00 ldmd -I
> 0.0.0.0 -P 388 -M 256 -m 3600 -o 3600 -q
> /usr/local/ldm/var/queues/ldm.pq /usr/local/ldm/etc/ldmd.conf
> ldm 30647 0.0 0.0 10392 900 pts/0 R+ 20:26 0:00 ps -aux
> ldm 30648 0.0 0.0 5944 596 pts/0 S+ 20:26 0:00 grep ldm
> [ldm@s15399185 ~]$ ps -aux | grep ldm
> Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See
> /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ
> root 30316 0.0 0.1 96516 3584 ? Ss 20:25 0:00 sshd:
> ldm [priv]
> ldm 30340 0.0 0.0 96516 1800 ? S 20:25 0:00 sshd:
> ldm@pts/0
> ldm 30342 0.0 0.0 10840 1572 pts/0 Ss 20:25 0:00 -bash
> ldm 30563 0.0 0.0 15852 1260 ? Ss 20:26 0:00 ldmd -I
> 0.0.0.0 -P 388 -M 256 -m 3600 -o 3600 -q
> /usr/local/ldm/var/queues/ldm.pq /usr/local/ldm/etc/ldmd.conf
> ldm 30565 0.1 0.3 766340 6436 ? S 20:26 0:00 pqact
> ldm 30566 0.1 0.3 766292 6392 ? S 20:26 0:00 rtstats
> -h rtstats.unidata.ucar.edu
> ldm 30567 1.1 1.0 773312 22032 ? S 20:26 0:00 ldmd -I
> 0.0.0.0 -P 388 -M 256 -m 3600 -o 3600 -q
> /usr/local/ldm/var/queues/ldm.pq /usr/local/ldm/etc/ldmd.conf
> ldm 30699 0.0 0.0 10392 900 pts/0 R+ 20:27 0:00 ps -aux
> ldm 30700 0.0 0.0 5944 596 pts/0 S+ 20:27 0:00 grep ldm
> [ldm@s15399185 ~]$ ps -aux | grep ldm
> Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See
> /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ
> root 30316 0.0 0.1 96516 3584 ? Ss 20:25 0:00 sshd:
> ldm [priv]
> ldm 30340 0.0 0.0 96516 1800 ? S 20:25 0:00 sshd:
> ldm@pts/0
> ldm 30342 0.0 0.0 10840 1572 pts/0 Ss 20:25 0:00 -bash
> ldm 30563 0.0 0.0 15852 1260 ? Ss 20:26 0:00 ldmd -I
> 0.0.0.0 -P 388 -M 256 -m 3600 -o 3600 -q
> /usr/local/ldm/var/queues/ldm.pq /usr/local/ldm/etc/ldmd.conf
> ldm 30565 0.2 0.3 766340 7108 ? S 20:26 0:00 pqact
> ldm 30566 0.1 0.3 766292 7064 ? S 20:26 0:00 rtstats
> -h rtstats.unidata.ucar.edu
> ldm 30567 1.2 1.1 773312 24776 ? S 20:26 0:00 ldmd -I
> 0.0.0.0 -P 388 -M 256 -m 3600 -o 3600 -q
> /usr/local/ldm/var/queues/ldm.pq /usr/local/ldm/etc/ldmd.conf
> ldm 31754 0.0 0.0 10392 900 pts/0 R+ 20:27 0:00 ps -aux
> ldm 31755 0.0 0.0 5944 596 pts/0 S+ 20:27 0:00 grep ldm
Process 30567 increased its virtual memory size from the first report to the
second, but not from the second report to the third. Did its virtual memory
size continue to increase?
Does only one ldmd(1) process increase its virtual memory size? If so, what
does that process receive (you can find that information in the LDM log file --
search for the PID and the word "Starting".
Is there anything untoward in the LDM log file from the process in question?
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: TBZ-761980
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed