[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Support #VOC-356419]: latency
- Subject: [Support #VOC-356419]: latency
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:42:12 -0600
Michael,
> Thanks much for the analysis and advice. I appreciate it greatly. One more
> question if you don't mind. I ran netstat this morning and found several of
> our field offices with upwards of 20 processes. Our western region office
> alone has 83 processes active or waiting. I wrote to my contact there and
> described the problem.
The problem is that you think there are too many processes?
> He told me that in their ldmd.conf file, they make three requests for each of
> their 24 field offices accounting for 72 requests, and then they have a few
> individual requests totaling 83. If I remember our training correctly, each
> of those requests results in a daemon on my LDM server.
Each REQUEST entry in an LDM configuration-file results in one downstream LDM
on the local host and one upstream LDM on the remote host.
> Western Region's LDM person seems to think that more requests like ".*"
> outperforms those like "EXP|FSL2|FSL3". He is out until Monday at which time
> I plan to place a call. Do I understand this correctly?
I'm not sure I understand this last part. ".*" is a pattern for matching
against a product's identifier and "EWXP|FSL2|FSL3" is a feedtype expression
for matching against a product's feedtype. They're apples and oranges.
> Thanks again,
> Michael
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: VOC-356419
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed