[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[LDM #PNF-494350]: #include "ldm.h" problem
- Subject: [LDM #PNF-494350]: #include "ldm.h" problem
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:29:35 -0600
Jim,
> I am trying to compile some old C++ files of ours that include ldm.h. It
> used to work with ldm-5.2.2 and gcc-3.2.3, but I am trying to upgrade to
> ldm-6.6.5 and gcc-4.1.2. Here are the errors I am getting:
>
> /usr/local/ldm/include/ldm.h:386: error: declaration of 'prod_class*
> feedpar::prod_class'
> /usr/local/ldm/include/ldm.h:372: error: changes meaning of 'prod_class'
> from 'typedef struct prod_class prod_class'
> /usr/local/ldm/include/ldm.h:520: error: declaration of 'prod_class*
> fornme_reply_t::<anonymous union>::prod_class'
> /usr/local/ldm/include/ldm.h:372: error: changes meaning of 'prod_class'
> from 'typedef struct prod_class prod_class'
> make[3]: *** [bddsReader.o] Error 1
>
> I would greatly appreciate any suggestions you might have.
I found this in the CHANGE_LOG file for version 6.7.0:
Added the typedef "prod_class_t" to the header-file "ldm.h"
and changed all code and documentation to use it instead of
the typedef "prod_class". This was done to allow "ldm.h" to
be processed by a C++ compiler. The typedef "prod_class"
still exists for backward compatibility -- though it is no
longer used in the code. Both C and C++ programmers should
now use "prod_class_t" instead of "prod_class".
I recommend getting the latest version of the LDM and changing all your uses of
"prod_class" to "prod_class_t".
> Thanks,
> Jim
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: PNF-494350
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed