[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IDD #FBU-715927]: ldm connection problem
- Subject: [IDD #FBU-715927]: ldm connection problem
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:21:49 -0600
Mike,
> I've been having trouble feeding data from rossby.met.sjsu.edu to
> chinook.metoc.nrlmry.navy.mil. I was able to feed data to this
> machine awhile back, but then the navy did some firewall changes. So,
> I don't think this is my problem, but I'm not sure.
>
> Chinook does NOT show up at all in ldmd.log, but there is traffic
> from and to chinook based on tcpdump.
>
> I am attaching a file which shows a tcpdump of port 388 traffic
> between rossby and chinook. Our campus network guy says this shows
> that rossby is not responding to the requests from chinook by how
> long it's taking to respond. This makes no sense to me. Could you
> perhaps confirm or deny if this theory if possible. And, if chinook
> is requesting, wouldn't that request at least be showing up in ldmd.log?
Put Rossby's top-level LDM server in verbose logging mode by
sending the process a USR2 signal (e.g., "kill -USR2 <<pid>>").
It will then log all connection attempts in the log file.
To disable this logging, send the process *two* more USR2
signals.
> Here are the entries in my ldmd.conf, which should allow chinook:
> ----------------
> allow ANY \.mil$
> allow ANY ^199\.9\.0\.106$
Assuming the IP address and hostname are correct, the above
should work.
> ----------------
>
> I'm not having trouble feeding anyone else.
>
> thanks,
>
> -Mike
>
>
> --------------------------
> Mike Voss
> Department of Meteorology
> San Jose State University
> One Washington Square
> San Jose, CA 95192-0104
>
> 408.924.5204 voice
> 408.924.5191 fax
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: FBU-715927
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: On Hold