[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[LDM #XXW-990118]: LDM - Not your average latency problem

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [LDM #XXW-990118]: LDM - Not your average latency problem
  • Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:05:55 -0600
Mike,

> Yes, we can leave it off overnight. I do have plans to pare-down the NIMGE
> feed to just the products they need. This is easier to do when the feed
> types are separated, and hence another reason I'm interested in the
> behavior when the feed requests are separated.
> 
> Is it even possible to make special requests, like "request NIMAGE
> "WEST-CONUS" ..." (or more complicated) when combining feed requests? Never
> tried that.

It's possible but very, very ugly.

If the latency improves due to the removal of the NIMAGE data, then I would 
next split the combined REQUEST entry into separate one, verify that the 
performance is OK, and only then try adding a *subset* of the NIMAGE data.

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: XXW-990118
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: On Hold