Re: ldm upgrade...acting odd

Gabe,

Are things OK now?

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

------- Original Message

Date:    Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:19:44 -0400
From:    Gabe Langbauer <address@hidden>To:      Steve 
          Emmerson <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: ldm upgrade...acting odd 
Organization: Ohio State University


> The above message contained the following:
>
>> I know that the old pqact is being used because (the most obvious thing)
>> the continued creation of data in the data/EXP with the suffix _old  This
>> call was created as a test to try to figure out which pqact was running.
>
> That would work IF the old and new pqact(1) utilities used different
> configuration-files.  By default, they both use the non-version-specific
> configuration-file $HOME/etc/pqact.conf.  In the LDM configuration-file

I see

> that was being used by the version 6.1.0 LDM, did the pqact(1) EXEC
> entry explicitly specify a pqact(1) configuration file?

Not that I can think of/find.  The ldmd.conf simply states EXEC pqact

There was a version specific path found in the 6.1 etc directory for the 
file ldmadmin-pl.conf, where it stated the 
$LDMHOME="/usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.1.0

But I don't think that was our problem since echo $LDMHOME already stated 
/usr/local/ldm
  >
> If not, then you might be confusing an "etc/" subdirectory in a
> version-specific subdirectory with the version-independent one in the
> LDM user's home directory.  Version-specific subdirectories should not
> contain "etc/" subdirectories (but did in your case).

Right.  I'm not sure why we had a version specific previously, but on the 
new build I tried to not have one, only after I ran into this problem did 
I create a link from the 6.3 subdirectory to $home/etc.  The pqact that 
has the _old extension on the data coming in through the EXP file types is 
found at /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.1.0/etc/pqact.conf (no symbolic links) where 
the one I want to be using is /usr/local/ldm/etc/pqact.conf

  >
> Regards,
> Steve Emmerson
>

------- End of Original Message