[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20050513: doubt with filenames
- Subject: 20050513: doubt with filenames
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 15:59:58 -0600
>From: Gerry Creager n5jxs <address@hidden>
>Organization: AATLT, Texas A&M University
>Keywords: 200505132137.j4DLbRP3013071 LDM file matching pattern
Hi Gerry,
re:
>Yes, I think so...
The 8th pattern in parenthesis should be '(gz)$' not '(gz$)' (i.e.,
don't include the end of line indicator in the pattern). Then again,
you could simply list the 'gz' suffix in the FILE value:
FILE WMM5v\1-TAM_\2T\3_\4T\5_\6T\7_gz
Also, given your example:
WMM5v370-TAM_yyyymmddThhmm_yyy1m1d1Th100_yyy2m2d2Th200_DOMAIN1_Z.bin.gz
I think you mean to have:
FILE WMM5v\1-TAM_\2T\3_\4T\5_\6T\7.gz
or
FILE WMM5v\1-TAM_\2T\3_\4T\5_\6T\7.\8
re:
>Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:43:01 -0500
>From: "Smith, Matt" <address@hidden>
>To: "Gerry Creager n5jxs" <address@hidden>
>Cc: "Tom Yoksas" <address@hidden>
>I don't really care if it's something shorter. As long as it's within
>the 9 allowed LDM "variables". I've never seen an example of using the
>"$". Will it accomplish my goal in this case?
What exactly is your goal? The '$' character is special in regular
expressions, it means the end of the string.
Cheers,
Tom
>You're thinking I should not send it as the complete SCOOP filename but
>with something shorter? If I understood better how to do arithmatic
>operations in pqact, I could possibly send the original filename with a
>product name in pqinsert:-)
>
>the 'normal' MM5 output name would be something like MMOUT_DOMAIN1_04
>
>Tom, I'm thinkin' I'm getting out of my depth on pqact. If you've
>comments, let me know, please!
>
>gerry
>
> $1 $2 $3
>^WMM5v|(...)|-TAM_|([1-2][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-1][0-9][0-3][0-9])||([0-2][0-9])|_|(
> $4 $5 $6
>[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-1][0-9][0-3][0-9])||([0-2][0-9])|_|([0-9][0-9][0-9][0
> $7 $8
>-9][0-1][0-9][0-3][0-9])||([0-2][0-9])|_|(gz$)|
>
>Smith, Matt wrote:
>> Gerry,
>> quick question-
>>
>> Would LDM handle the MM5 SCOOPname like so?
>>
>> EXP
>> ^WMM5v(...)-TAM_([1-2][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-1][0-9][0-3][0-9])([0-2][0-9])_([0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-1][0-9][0-3][0-9])([0-2][0-9])_([0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-1][0-9][0-3][0-9])([0-2][0-9])_(gz$)
>> FILE WMM5v\1-TAM_\2T\3_\4T\5_\6T\7_\8
>> WMM5v370-TAM_yyyymmddThhmm_yyy1m1d1Th100_yyy2m2d2Th200_DOMAIN1_Z.bin.gz
>>
>> I know it's a jumble - but the question is about field #8. Will it find
>> the string ending in "gz" and define it as field #8 (\8) equal to
>> "DOMAIN1_Z.bin.gz"?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>>
>> Matt Smith
>> Information Technology & Systems Center
>> University of Alabama in Huntsville
>> at the National Space Science and Technology Center
>> 320 Sparkman Dr.
>> Huntsville, AL 35805
>> ph 256-961-7809 fax 256-961-7859
>> e-mail address@hidden
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Gerry Creager n5jxs [mailto:address@hidden]
>>>Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 1:57 PM
>>>To: Smith, Matt
>>>Cc: address@hidden
>>>Subject: Re: doubt with filenames
>>>
>>>
>>>.lv2 is still better for the radar displays to differentiate them as
>>>Level II volume scan data, in my opinion.
>>>
>>>.bin for the MM5 data, at least 'til I start moving it all to
>>>netCDF...
>>>
>>>I'll make the change
>>>gerry
>>>
>>>Smith, Matt wrote:
>>>
>>>>Yes, good catch. It needs to have a format type attached. We
>>>>mentioned it in the Wed. telecon - and ".lv2" came up - but
>>>
>>>we didn't
>>>
>>>>settle anything about it. I think ".bin" is much better
>>>
>>>than ".lv2".
>>>
>>>>".lv2" is descriptive, but not a "format".
>>>>
>>>>Agreed?
>>>>
>>>>If so, I'll change the spreadsheet.
>>>>Matt
>>>>
>>>>Matt Smith
>>>>Information Technology & Systems Center
>>>>University of Alabama in Huntsville
>>>>at the National Space Science and Technology Center
>>>>320 Sparkman Dr.
>>>>Huntsville, AL 35805
>>>>ph 256-961-7809 fax 256-961-7859
>>>>e-mail address@hidden
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: Gerry Creager n5jxs [mailto:address@hidden]
>>>>>Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 1:33 PM
>>>>>To: address@hidden
>>>>>Cc: Smith, Matt
>>>>>Subject: Re: doubt with filenames
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>That filename is in error. We've been evolving to the right names,
>>>>>which are now like:
>>>>>
>>>>>WMM5v37-TAM_20050511T00_20050511T00_20050511T00_Z_DOMAIN1.gz
>>>>>I'm not putting in the format... but perhaps I have to. Let
>>>>>me ask Matt
>>>>>and we will add it as 'bin' if we need to.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks! Good catch!
>>>>>gerry
>>>>>
>>>>>Kaustav Ghoshal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gerry,
>>>>>> I found some files in /data1/ldm/SCOOP/TAMU.The names
>>>>>
>>>>>are more or
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>less like
>>>>>>WMM5-TAM_20050509T0000_20050510T1200_20050510T1600_Z_DOMAIN1.gz
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I see that the ancilliary description field in these atmospheric
>>>>>>forcing model files is missing.Is this an optional
>>>>>
>>>>>field?From what I
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>get from the Naming convention writeup,this is a required field.Can
>>>>>>you please clarify.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>~kay
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Gerry Creager -- address@hidden
>>>>>Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
>>>>>Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020
>>>>>FAX: 979.847.8578 Pager: 979.228.0173
>>>>>Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Gerry Creager -- address@hidden
>>>Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
>>>Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020
>>>FAX: 979.847.8578 Pager: 979.228.0173
>>>Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
>>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>Gerry Creager -- address@hidden
>Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
>Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020
>FAX: 979.847.8578 Pager: 979.228.0173
>Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
Cheers,
Tom
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
* Tom Yoksas UCAR Unidata Program *
* (303) 497-8642 (last resort) P.O. Box 3000 *
* address@hidden Boulder, CO 80307 *
* Unidata WWW Service http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/*
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+