This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: Mai Nguyen <address@hidden> >Organization: National Center for Hydro-Meteorological Forecasting of Vietnam >Keywords: 200312020023.hB20N4p2027742 IDD LDM Linux Hi Mai, >I'm hoping to get the decoder to McIDAS AREA. In the >worst case, would that be possible to know its format? >We'll write our own program to make it to that format. The McIDAS AREA format is a well published standard format for imagery data. I can provide information on the format of the data if it comes to that. I feel confident, however, that SSEC will have the routine we are looking for. It is always best to not "reinvent the wheel". >The NAWIPS package we've got from Honolulu WFO, where >I spent 6 weeks on the forecast training. But, it runs >only with a sample data set in local machine, not the >automated ingesting system. And also I am strugling to >figure out how to configure different types of data. > >So, if it's possible, could you please install the >Unidata release of GEMPAK to ldm in my machine? (I >guess if you could with ldm, you can also do with >NAWIPS!). Yes, we can do this. I have to say, however, that the binary GEMPAK distribution from Unidata is _very_ easy to install. It may be best to help you through the installation so that you would feel comfortable when the time comes to upgrading the package in the future. After the download, the installation and configuration should only take a few minutes. >I don't know the difference b/w GEMPAK and >NAWIPS. I mostly interested in using NMAP2, NTRANS, >NSAT, and NSHARP. Are these utilities available in >GEMPAK also? Yes, all of these are available in the Unidata GEMPAK release. Like I said in my previous email, our distribution of GEMPAK is a superset of the one you can get from NOAA/NCEP. In fact, virtually everyone except the NOAA folks use the Unidata release. The Unidata developer, Steve Chiswell, is a major contributor to both releases, so you would be getting the best of all worlds by using our distribution. Also, I talked to Steve yesterday about decoding your model data into GEMPAK format. He said that this will be very easy if you are using standard GRIB definition tables. If you have tables that have been created to be specific for Hanoi, he will need to update some GEMPAK tables to incorporate your definitions. Are you fully conversant with the specifics of the model data you want to incorporate into GEMPAK? I ask this to make sure that the comment in the last paragraph means something to you. If not, we will need to have one or two email exchanges with someone that is familiar with the GRIB file output of the model you are interested in. >It's nice that you've "confessed" about transferring >data to Antartica. So maybe we will have to prepare a >backup system for this. Well, I get kidded here about my enthusiasm for extending LDM/IDD delivered data to remote places in the world :-) >Thanks Tom as usual. I'm looking foreward to your >reply. I will be out of the office today, so please don't expect any news about a S-VISSR to AREA converter today. I hope to be able to get to this tomorrow. Cheers, Tom -- NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publically available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.