[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LLDM 6.0.14 on RedHat 9

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: LLDM 6.0.14 on RedHat 9
  • Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:15:34 -0600
Carl,

>Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:59:33 -0500
>From: Carl Sinclair <address@hidden>
>Organization: CAPS
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: LLDM 6.0.14 on RedHat 9

The above message contained the following:

> I have one question:  Why does LDM suddenly use the TCP protocol to
> contact Portmap (on an upstream host) instead of UDP?
> 
> Here is why:  Before upgrading to RedHat 9, LDM consistently used the
> UDP protocol to contact upstream Portmappers.
> 
> This is a small difference and should not matter, but I am curious.

The decision on whether to use TCP or UDP to contact the portmapper on
the upstream host is made by the RPC layer and not the LDM.  Apparently,
RH 9's RPC layer differs from RH 8's.

I strongly doubt that this is the underlying cause of your problem.  I
believe that if the upstream LDM on Branch could use the well-known LDM
port (388) then your problems would be solved.

I haven't heard back from Rita on why the LDM on Branch can't get port
388.

> Thanks.
> 
> Carl
> 
> -- 
> _______________________
> Carl Sinclair
> OU/CAPS Research Associate
> (405)325-5938

Regards,
Steve Emmerson