[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20030805: differences between LDM 5 and 6
- Subject: 20030805: differences between LDM 5 and 6
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 14:55:56 -0600
Karen,
>Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 15:23:18 -0500
>From: "Karen Cooper" <address@hidden>
>Organization: CIMMS at NSSL
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: 20030805: differences between LDM 5 and 6
The above message contained the following:
> I can't give you access to the originating machine, because it's not
> mine. It's one of Carl Sinclair's CRAFT machines, and he and I have
> been working together on the problem.
The CRAFT data-products are known to have wildly inaccurate
product-creation times. See, for example
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/rtstats/iddstats_nc?CRAFT+thelma.ucar.edu
The large positive and negative latencies are due solely to inaccurate
product-creation times.
> The reason we suspect LDM (or tcp/rpc) is that we are missing entire
> packets. For instance, yesterday I got a volume scan that had only 300
> radials for one of it's elevations. The final packet of data that
> should have contained the 60+ radials left in the elevation was
> apparently never received (or didn't get written to file by pqact, or
> something...). However, it is included in the LDM output file on the
> machine that directly ingest the raw data. None of the downstream
> machines received it.
Look at the logfile of the downstream LDM for that time period. Was
there a reconnection?
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
LDM Developer