This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Unidata Support wrote: > > ------- Forwarded Message > > >To: address@hidden > >From: Harry Edmon <address@hidden> > >Subject: LDM - feed type problems > >Organization: UCAR/Unidata > >Keywords: 200206181536.g5IFaj614056 > > Today's NCAR outage pointed out to me another deficiency in the current > system. > Let's use my topology: > > Feeding sunny: WMO - thelma, MCIDAS - unidata.ssec.wisc.edu > > Feedtype to air from sunny - UNIDATA > > Now, thelma had been unavailable for 30 minutes, but the MCIDAS feed continued > to work. I stopped and restarted sunny with WMO from LSU. When air requested > data again from sunny after the restart - the request time was the last > UNIDATA > product received, which was the last MCIDAS product. Since the MCIDAS feed > had > not been disrupted, this was a very recent time. Thus, air would not have > received the missing 30 minutes of WMO data! I fixed this by changing air to > seperately request MCIDAS and WMO. > > This points out a serious architectural problem with the LDM - one I think we > have discussed before. The times that really should be used in the requests > to > upstream hosts are the times the product was inserted into the upstream host's > queue, not the time the product was inserted into the LDM system by the > originating host. > > -- > Dr. Harry Edmon E-MAIL: address@hidden > 206-543-0547 address@hidden > Dept of Atmospheric Sciences FAX: 206-543-0308 > University of Washington, Box 351640, Seattle, WA 98195-1640 > > ------- End of Forwarded Message Hi Harry, I agree that the LDM has a serious architectural problem. It orders products in the local queue by local ingest time, not IDD ingest time. (It does, however, use IDD ingest timestamp of the product in forming the request.) We discussed changing it to order products by IDD ingest time, but found that there were scenarios where that did not solve the problem of skipping products that should be relayed. Are you suggesting ordering products by time of ingest at the upstream hosts or ordering products by local ingest time but stamping them with the time of ingest at the upstream host? But, I'm not convinced either approach fixes the problem. In your scenario, all air knows is the timestamp of its most recent product from sunny, the MCIDAS product. Whether that time stamp is IDD ingest time or sunny's ingest time (which would be even later than IDD ingest time), that time is still probably later than some products from thelma. How could this help air in making a request? I'm probably missing something. Perhaps a workable solution would be to request starting from the *oldest* product from a particular host, rather than the newest. This would cause duplicates to be relayed, but seems like it would eliminate the problem of skipping products that should be relayed. It would be better than using the -o option, which determines a time value relative to "now", rather than relative to anything in the queue. I'm coming to think that given our current architecture the best we can do is either miss products or relay duplicates. Another solution is to have a separate connection for each feed type, as you did, although this doesn't scale well and may use connections poorly in case of a sporadic feed type. (INN, the news server, keeps a queue of products to be relayed to each "peer". This is a more complex solution, but also seems more correct.) Btw, you probably noticed that I've been sidetracked since working on using pqutil to log products for the purpose of tallying product loss. But, we feel it's important and I hope to get back to it soon. Anne -- *************************************************** Anne Wilson UCAR Unidata Program address@hidden P.O. Box 3000 Boulder, CO 80307 ---------------------------------------------------- Unidata WWW server http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ ****************************************************