This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: "James R. Frysinger" <address@hidden> >Organization: College of Charleston >Keywords: 200111061842.fA6Igt112242 LDM binary install Jim, re: root privilege >Yes, I have root priviledges; my colleague has shared the password >with me. In fact, I am essentially serving as the sysadmin for that >particular computer under his tuteledge. He maintains a cluster of >computers linked by NFS mounts. OK, good. So you can finish off the LDM installation. >I took another look at the directions for LDM prerequisites yesterday >and I see that it calls for downloading and installing the source code >rather than downloading the binary if one's installation organization >is non-standard. Ours seems to fall into that category. Yes and no. A binary installation can be configured to match your setup. The biggest things are making the HOME directory of 'ldm' look like /usr/local/ldm; the ~ldm/data directory a link to /export/home/mcdata/ldm; and ~ldm/logs a link to /export/home/mcdata/ldm/logs; etc. >So I downloaded >the source code tarball, but have not done a make on it. What I did do >was to get partway through the preinstallation prerequisites sheet >again. We pull time off a local computer which is NTP-based, but that >should work satisfactorily. Agreed. >Later, if we need to, I can configure and >initialize the ntpd on 'weather' similar to my xntpd here at home. It doesn't matter how you make sure the clock is correct. It just matters that it is correct! >Then I went back to recheck myself on the prerequisite list; some of >this had already been done by me on Nov 21, even though I'm using the >near-past tense here. The lines that are to be added to /etc/cservices >were added to our /etc/inet/services, reflecting our local installation >set up. I also modified /etc/rpc and /etc/syslog.conf per the >instructions. I went ahead and created an /export/home/ldm directory in >lieu of a /usr/local/ldm directory. I also created a symbolic link to >that in /usr/local. Good. >I then configured the ldm user account as per the >instructions, using /export/home/ldm as the value for LDHOME. I also >set the umask as 002; I seem to remember a note from somewhere in the >mcidas instructions to do that for the ldm account, You are remembering correctly. >though I don't see >it here. You might want to check my ldm .cshrc. I think I have the >directory structure of the ldm user account set up properly. OK. Things are going well. >Now, here's where I'm a little less confident. Rather than setting up >the /var/data/.... directories indicated, I set up >/export/home/mcdata/ldm and /export/home/mcdata/ldm/logs. /var/data is used as an example only. Your setup is OK. >I was tempted >to leave off that layer of the ldm subdirectory since you said that ldm >data no longer needs to be segregated from mcidas data. Not exactly. I said that the McIDAS-XCD data does not need to be kept separate from the data files created by ldm-mcidas decoders. This is not the same as saying that McIDAS data doesn't need to be kept separate from ldm data. >Then I would >have made the log path read something like /export/home/mcdata/ldm-log. What about: ~ldm/data <-> /export/home/mcdata/ldm/data (link) ~ldm/logs <-> /export/home/mcdata/ldm/logs (link) >I chickened out for fear of getting too far from a standard >installation. What are your thoughts on that? Be brave :-). >I then checked to make sure that I had fininshed the prerequisite >sheet instructions with the etc, decoders, & util directories under >/export/home/ldm and establishing the links as indicated. Again, you >may wish to check those. I took a quick look yesterday and did not see anything that raised any red flags. >So, I think I'm ready to do the make on the source code. Do you >concur? (Or should I go back and do the binary installation again, >instead of making from source?) I think that the binary installation will work fine for you. Hmm... this got me thinking. To check executableness (not a word, but you get my meaning) of binaries, do an 'ldd': cd ~ldm/bin ldd pqact etc. If all shared libraries can be found, you will be OK. If not, you will probably need to build from source. re: The LDM only needs to be installed/configured on the ingest machine. >Great! So, all users need is McIDAS-X, which will handle all their >ADDE calls to 'weather', else they could scp the data from there. Instead of making users scp data from weather, I would make the file system containing data files available to other machines by NFS. >Most >of these machines will not be NFSed to weather; we're keeping a rather >tight network here and not putting all the faculty's accounts in the >NFS mount list. Understood, but if you install GEMPAK, you _will_ need to NFS mount the data. >I didn't get to the material below yesterday. I'll try that out while >I'm waiting for your go-ahead on making ldm source. (Instead I >entertained myself by finishing up a proposed revision to an IEEE >metric standard in preparation for this coming meeting.) OK. Talk to you later... >regards, >Jim > >TO DO: >> >I can dig around and see if I still have the links we used last >> > January for feeds. >> >> OK. Our records indicate that you had the following setup: >> >> primary feed site: pluto.met.fsu.edu >> failover feed site: cirp.met.utah.edu >> >> This information is accessible online: >> >> Unidata HomePage: >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu >> Software >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/Software.html >> IDD >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/idd/index.html >> Current Operational Status >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/idd/iddgeneral.html#status >> IDD Site Contact List >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/idd/sitelist.html >> >> >Don't know if they are still open to us or not, though. We >> >have not changed our fully qualified hostname so they might still >> >work! >> >> They should still work. You can test this quickly and easily from >> your LDM account: >> >> notifyme -vxl- -o 3600 -h pluto.met.fsu.edu >> >> - and/or - >> >> notifyme -vxl- -o 3600 -h cirp.met.utah.edu >> >> If you are still allowed to request data from these sites, then the >> notifyme invocations will work. If not, you will get a 'Connection >> refused' message. >.... > >-- >James R. Frysinger University/College of Charleston >10 Captiva Row Dept. of Physics and Astronomy >Charleston, SC 29407 66 George Street >843.225.0805 Charleston, SC 29424 >http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj address@hidden >Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist 843.953.7644 Tom