This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Thanks Stonie..I appreciate it very much. -----Original Message----- From: Stonie R. Cooper [mailto:address@hidden] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:42 PM To: Robert Mullenax Cc: Cannon, Declan; Wells, Timothy; address@hidden Subject: Re: ldm problems and separating feed types.. Robert, I'll take this off-line due to the obvious ramifications that it may appear as self-promotion - and that is not my intent. I'm assuming you have either SDI straight from SSEC, or from the now defunct Alden. We are only familiar with them in-as-much as we have been brought in to replace such systems with ours - and LDM is one of the reasons why. I'll copy Declan, also, as I know he has seen queries in mail lists about the same problem as it occurs with Unisys's system - i.e. the pqing simply dies with a "resource unavailable" error. You can ask Dan Vietor, also, but I'm pretty sure that they inject data into the LDM pretty much the same way as the Alden/SSEC system. I don't know that there is a resolution around this, as of yet. From Unidata/UCAR mail archives, my exposure to the SDI system was that Alden was trying to make this look exactly like a FOS feed; NRS data, though, as you know, is not FOS - and does not have the inherit distinction of "feedtype". If the SDI software allows you establish fifos beyond the ones you have listed, you may be able to segment the data further - but from your list below, all messages coming in from the /tmp/jmb.fifo.4 are bitwise or'ed as both IDS and DDPLUS - thus you can't separate them - all messages have both feedtypes. If SDI allows you to segment further, make the data you want to be only IDS or only DDPLUS go to separate fifo's and add pqing entries for those, and changing the feedtype parm passed to be either just IDS or DDPLUS: exec "pqing -f ids|ddplus /tmp/jmb.fifo.4" exec "pqing -f hrs /tmp/jmb.fifo.5" exec "pqing -f ids /tmp/jmb.fifo.6" exec "pqing -f ddplus /tmp/jmb.fifo.7" Again, thought, this assumes you can do some product definition upstream withint the SDI software. Unidata has a great reference on-line about how feedtypes are supposed to be defined - with links to NOAA/WMO where it applies: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/packages/ldm/feedtypes/index.html And, yes, we do our LDM implementation completely different (for the above reasons), and then set our NRS to stream data to the LDM with feedtypes to match the current IDD (as much as we can). Stonie On Monday 06 August 2001 16:36, you wrote: > We have an SDI NOAAPORT box that is ingesting text/binary and the GINI sat > imagery. We have an ldm > running on the machine that is using the ingest from the fifos: > > exec "pqing -f ids|ddplus /tmp/jmb.fifo.4" > exec "pqing -f hrs /tmp/jmb.fifo.5" > > We get occasional periods where the ldm just quits receiving data (the > McIDAS socket connection keeps working) > and an error says: pqinsert..file name..resource unavailable. Has > anyone else seen this before? The ldm > has to be stopped and restarted. > > Also, is there a way we can split the feed type so the IDS is separate. On > our downstream machines we'd > like to file it separately and right now, even with separate DDPLUS and IDS > pqact entries..the same data > is in each stream. > > Thanks, > Robert Mullenax > > Robert Mullenax > Weather Systems Administrator > Universal Weather and Aviation -- Stonie R. Cooper, Science Officer Planetary Data, Incorporated 3495 Liberty Road Villa Rica, Georgia 30180 ph. (770) 456-0700; pg. (888) 974-5017; fx. (770) 459-0016 From address@hidden Mon Aug 6 11:41:52 2001 Received: from kiwi.pyro.net (address@hidden [207.7.10.2]) by unidata.ucar.edu (UCAR/Unidata) with SMTP id f76Hfp118289 for <address@hidden>; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:41:52 -0600 (MDT) Keywords: 200108061741.f76Hfp118289 Received: (qmail 6270 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 17:56:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO helium.fieldlab.planetarydata.com) (216.126.169.251) by mail.pyro.net with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 17:56:57 -0000 From: "Stonie R. Cooper" <address@hidden> Reply-To: address@hidden Organization: Planetary Data, Incorporated Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 17:41:42 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Robert Mullenax <address@hidden> References: <address@hidden> In-Reply-To: <address@hidden> Subject: Re: ldm problems and separating feed types.. Cc: "Cannon, Declan" <address@hidden>, "Wells, Timothy" <address@hidden>, address@hidden MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <address@hidden> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Robert, I'll take this off-line due to the obvious ramifications that it may appear as self-promotion - and that is not my intent. I'm assuming you have either SDI straight from SSEC, or from the now defunct Alden. We are only familiar with them in-as-much as we have been brought in to replace such systems with ours - and LDM is one of the reasons why. I'll copy Declan, also, as I know he has seen queries in mail lists about the same problem as it occurs with Unisys's system - i.e. the pqing simply dies with a "resource unavailable" error. You can ask Dan Vietor, also, but I'm pretty sure that they inject data into the LDM pretty much the same way as the Alden/SSEC system. I don't know that there is a resolution around this, as of yet. From Unidata/UCAR mail archives, my exposure to the SDI system was that Alden was trying to make this look exactly like a FOS feed; NRS data, though, as you know, is not FOS - and does not have the inherit distinction of "feedtype". If the SDI software allows you establish fifos beyond the ones you have listed, you may be able to segment the data further - but from your list below, all messages coming in from the /tmp/jmb.fifo.4 are bitwise or'ed as both IDS and DDPLUS - thus you can't separate them - all messages have both feedtypes. If SDI allows you to segment further, make the data you want to be only IDS or only DDPLUS go to separate fifo's and add pqing entries for those, and changing the feedtype parm passed to be either just IDS or DDPLUS: exec "pqing -f ids|ddplus /tmp/jmb.fifo.4" exec "pqing -f hrs /tmp/jmb.fifo.5" exec "pqing -f ids /tmp/jmb.fifo.6" exec "pqing -f ddplus /tmp/jmb.fifo.7" Again, thought, this assumes you can do some product definition upstream withint the SDI software. Unidata has a great reference on-line about how feedtypes are supposed to be defined - with links to NOAA/WMO where it applies: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/packages/ldm/feedtypes/index.html And, yes, we do our LDM implementation completely different (for the above reasons), and then set our NRS to stream data to the LDM with feedtypes to match the current IDD (as much as we can). Stonie On Monday 06 August 2001 16:36, you wrote: > We have an SDI NOAAPORT box that is ingesting text/binary and the GINI sat > imagery. We have an ldm > running on the machine that is using the ingest from the fifos: > > exec "pqing -f ids|ddplus /tmp/jmb.fifo.4" > exec "pqing -f hrs /tmp/jmb.fifo.5" > > We get occasional periods where the ldm just quits receiving data (the > McIDAS socket connection keeps working) > and an error says: pqinsert..file name..resource unavailable. Has > anyone else seen this before? The ldm > has to be stopped and restarted. > > Also, is there a way we can split the feed type so the IDS is separate. On > our downstream machines we'd > like to file it separately and right now, even with separate DDPLUS and IDS > pqact entries..the same data > is in each stream. > > Thanks, > Robert Mullenax > > Robert Mullenax > Weather Systems Administrator > Universal Weather and Aviation -- Stonie R. Cooper, Science Officer Planetary Data, Incorporated 3495 Liberty Road Villa Rica, Georgia 30180 ph. (770) 456-0700; pg. (888) 974-5017; fx. (770) 459-0016