This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
=============================================================================== Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ =============================================================================== ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:34:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Gilbert Sebenste <address@hidden> To: Robert Mullenax <address@hidden> 'Jessica Thomale' <address@hidden>, address@hidden Subject: RE: NOAAPort data server x86 configuration Hi Robert and everyone, > Gilbert, I think you are completely dismissing Solaris/Intel > here, which people frequently do..and Sun doesn't help matters > much. BTW Sun hardware prices have comes way down as well.. an EDU > promo Ultra 10 can be had for $2595(440Mhz Sparc 256MB RAM) and has > great application performance, even though raw CPU benchmarks, > aren't that impressive. That's fine, but if there's a problem with my machines, I can go out and get help from anyone, buy a hard drive from anywhere and stick it in. That's an oversimplification, of course, but you know what I am saying. You can't do that with custom equipment from Sun. > Actually, you were one I thinking of, when I said I thought > there would be opposing opinions on Solaris! I can't imagine why! :-D > But the fact is > you can take that same $4,000 Linux machine (with judicious > hardware choices) and run Solaris Intel. Solaris 7 was much improved > over 2.6, and 8 has the potential to be even better than 7. Much improved? Anything was better than Solaris 2.X. Granted, I have heard the same thing (it's a great improvement), but I still have had reports here at NIU of problems with it. That said, if you know your OS by heart and it works well, you don't know any other Unix versions, and your labs are all Solaris, you'd be crazy to take my suggestion and go to Linux or vice versa. If it works for you, stick with what you have. If you are getting a whole new lab system and don't know which OS to choose, my vote, of course, is for Linux. > Well, anyway, at least Jessica has a choice, there are too many > who would like to see Windows and Linux as the only OS choices.. > period..which is sad. I am not against Solaris. I am against inferior products and customer service from a company. For our dial-up modem pool at NIU this fall, they excitedly told us that we had gotten all new fast dial-up servers, all running Solaris 7. 3 months later, after every IT guy in the school was wearing paper bags over their heads when everyone either couldn't connect or got booted off and two patches didn't help at all, they junked it and went with a Linux system (don't know what they were running in either case, I just know the OS). Since then, it has worked well, and everyone is happy. Maybe this school is the Anti-Solaris. I dunno. I wouldn't be surprised. :-) ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** Internet: address@hidden (My opinions only!) ****** Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University **** E-mail: address@hidden *** web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** Work phone: 815-753-5492 * *******************************************************************************