[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 19991112: 19991109: LDM memory leak on IRIX64 (fwd)

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 19991112: 19991109: LDM memory leak on IRIX64 (fwd)
  • Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 09:06:40 -0700 (MST)

===============================================================================
Robb Kambic                                Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III                      Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden             WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 08:54:12 -0700
From: Russ Rew <address@hidden>
To: Unidata Support <address@hidden>
     address@hidden, address@hidden
Subject: Re: 19991112: 19991109: LDM memory leak on IRIX64 

> So the queue is not growing. So, they are not seeing any problem
> with a growable queue. The memory map usage has just grown over time to
> match that of the product queue usage from what I see.

Right, and the growth is so slow because what they are seeing is the
"high water mark" of mapped memory use for each process.  It will
approach but will never exceed the actual queue size.

--Russ