[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linux LDM (fwd)
- Subject: Re: Linux LDM (fwd)
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 16:02:55 -0600 (MDT)
===============================================================================
Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 14:27:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gilbert Sebenste <address@hidden>
To: Robb Kambic <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Linux LDM (fwd)
Robb,
> Gilbert,
>
> Are you seeing any strange behavior on your Linux boxes with the ldm-5.0.8
> release? Is the queue growing, using more disk space, etc. What version
> of Linux are you using, size of queue, amount of ram, etc?
>
> Thanks,
> Robb...
>
> ===============================================================================
> Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center
> Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
> address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
> ===============================================================================
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 17:01:50 -0500 (CDT)
> From: David Wojtowicz <address@hidden>
>
> > David,
> >
> > Are you still running the LDM with mmap files so _MAPRGNS was
> > defined for Linux? I have a site with a 650megabyte queue that
> > having a problem. The queue seems to grow even though NOGROW was set.
> > Eventually the machine runs out of disk space. I'm trying to determine if
> > the problem is the site's configuration or it's the _MAPRGNS flag being
> > set? What's your experiences?
> >
>
> Hi Robb,
>
> No, I'm not seeing any queue growth on Linux with _MAPRGNS set.
> The actual size of the queue file is slightly larger than is
> specified in ldmadmin, but that seems to be a rounding off kind
> of thing. They don't seem to be growing during operation.
> I checked the queue size on the NMC2 ingest machine which
> has been running for over a month without a ldm restart and
> then remade the queue. It is the same size after remaking
> as before, so it had not grown any during a long period of
> operation. That is a RH6.0 machine with a ~800MB queue.
>
> I also checked our main ldm machine running 5.3 with a ~300MB
> queue and the same is true there, though it gets restarted
> more frequently. So, I'd say, no, we're not seeing any
> queue growth.
>
> Note...I'm still using a pre-release version of 5.0.8 with my own mods to
> define _MAPRGNS...had not gotten around to installing the final one yet so
> there may be a difference there. You might ask Gilbert Sebenste.
> I helped him install the new 5.0.8 on both of his Linux boxes last
> week.
>
> --david
I am using Red Hat Linux 6.0 on both my boxes, latest patches/kernel
update with the official 5.0.8 update (thanks, David...I can now install
it by myself!). I have a 275 MB queue on both machines.. I have 250 MB of
RAM on both machines; one is a single PII 450, the other dual PII 450
MHZ processors machine from SW Technologies. I just noticed that my ldm.pq
is 281 MB, so it is exceeding the limit I have specified slightly. But I
haven't had any problems with it that I am aware of.
Gilbert
*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste ********
Internet: address@hidden (My opinions only!) ******
Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University ****
Work phone: 815-753-5492 ***
*******************************************************************************