[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ldm 5.0.6?

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: ldm 5.0.6?
  • Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 12:20:05 -0700 (MST)
Dana,

I'll compile ldm 5.0.6 on our RH box and let you know the results.

Robb...

% unama -a

Linux sunshine.unidata.ucar.edu 2.2.1 #5 SMP Wed Feb 3 18:44:58 MST 1999
i686


On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Dana Quinn wrote:

> 
> Are people using ldm 5.0.6 on Redhat 5.2 systems?  I just grabbed
> it and unpacked it.  I just started the compile, and I'm kinda surprised
> it didn't compile right 'out-of-the-box'.  I just got some error messages
> in the rpc section clnt_generic.c - it looks like a problem with
> prototype declaration or something, I'm sure it will be easy to
> fix.
> 
> My main question though is this - do we need a ulog patch from
> Rob, or is that in the unidata distribution.  It didn't look like
> Rob has a patch for 5.0.6 on his site.
> 
> I tried 5.0.6 on another rh 5.2 system a while back, and i did get it
> to compile, but it didn't work.  so i downgraded to 5.0.5 and things do
> work, but i'm seeing enough odd things that i thought it would be
> good to upgrade.
> 
> so - how are people doing with 5.0.6?
> 
> dana
> 

===============================================================================
Robb Kambic                                Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III                      Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden             WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================