[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
19990118: LDM Versions
- Subject: 19990118: LDM Versions
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:08:24 -0700
>From: address@hidden
>Organization: UC Davis
>Keywords: 199901190602.XAA13907 LDM
Erick,
>I am still plowing through the upgrade of McIDAS and LDM on our
>system at Davis. As my memory half life is probably about 6 weeks
>or less I have a question that you probably covered at the workshop
>but I can't remember if you did.
Fair enough.
>I have got McIDAS on line but isolated from data for the moment while
>I endeavor to upgrade LDM. I went to down load the binary dist. for LDM
>and discovered that there was none for IRIX 5.3.
>
>I thought well maybe you said something about not compiling for the
>older OS's because you only have so many machines. Fair enough.
Right you are. IRIX 5.3 is fairly old now. The current release of
IRIX is 6.5.
>Then I went to the source directory and found that the most recent
>version is 5.0.6. So my questions are:
>
>1. Is 5.0.6 in fact the most recent version that is available in
> source?
Yes.
>2. Will version 5.x.x work correctly with McIDAS 7.4?
Yes. The LDM really has nothing to do with McIDAS per se; it moves data
from place to place and can run user selected programs upon receipt of
products. The connection to McIDAS is by:
o running ldm-mcidas decoders; these work fine from all of the LDM releases
o running McIDAS ROUTE PostProcess BATCH invocations; this is accomplished
by running a substitute for the McIDAS BATCH command which, in turn, sets
up a McIDAS environment in which the real McIDAS BATCH command runs. This
works fine for McIDAS-X 7.x.
>3. I am already running LDM 5.0. Assuming that the answers to 1 and 2
> are "yes" is it worth my time to upgrade LDM now?
Yes it is. There have been several bugs fixed since the 5.0 release of the
LDM.
>Thanks for your help
You are welcome.
>Erick Lorenz, U C Davis
Tom Yoksas