This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>From: McIDAS <address@hidden> >Organization: McIDAS proyect >Keywords: 199912030405.VAA02145 ldm-mcidas Y2K Karli, Robb Kambic has responded on the LDM issues; I am responding with ldm-mcidas related issues. >I manually deleted the ldm.pq file and restarted ldm. So far the >program has been running for more than 40 minutes, so we'll have to >see if this keeps up. >I just checked the route.k file and to >my surprise most of the feeds are dated 99317 (but I am not sure what >day that is supposed to be). Today's date is 99337 (or 1999337). It appears, therefore, that the references in your ROUTE.SYS file are 20 days old. >Those are the latest dates except for NLDN with 99320. So, the lightning data is 17 days old. >If this fails also, I would be very glad if you log into >the machine. Just let me know how would you want me to supply the >password, if by phone or email. I can logon to your machine and check your setup if you provide me logins for both your 'mcidas' and 'ldm' users. I am assuming that the machine name that these packages are installed on is breeze.uprm.edu. Please let me know if this is not the case. >Also, the year's almost over and I beleive I hear that old versions of >ldm have Y2K problems, is this correct. The LDM does not have Y2K issues, but McIDAS and ldm-mcidas do. >If so what versions of ldm and >ldm-mcidas should I be running? Again, I have ldm 5.0.5 and ldm-mcidas >7.1.1 (or 7.1.3) running for Mcidas 7.5 which I'll soon upgrade to 7.6 You should upgrade to: McIDAS - 7.6 ldm-mcidas - 7.6.1 It is best/easiest to upgrade to these distributions in lock step. >Again, thanks. >Karli Lopez Tom Yoksas