This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
> How about 1.2 or 1.5 or 2? > Supersaturation with respect to ice does occur in nature. > RH is dimensionless so it seems reasonable to have software assume that a > lack of units means it is a fraction of saturation. > > > Thanks! > I’ll still hope Goddard fixes their end, so that IDV 5.3 and prior versions > will work OK for our lab manual. It goes off to press March 1! > > > Brian I can let the formula fix the problem of no unit or bad unit, this is quick and easy. How about not changing the value and the user can always call a formula to do it yourself. Yuan > > > > > On Feb 23, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Unidata IDV Support <address@hidden> wrote: > > > >> Yeah that should work, unless RH slightly greater than 1 occurs. > >> > >> > > > > Well, I did see RH slightly greater than 1 in your dataset, is it ok to set > > the range between 0 and 1.1? > > > > Yuan > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: GDD-561087 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open =================== NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.