This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
> I dont think you have to promise me anything. You have been kind and > patient enough to me. > Anyways how McIDAS user group meet at madison? > Very good. But I only stayed there one day. > We are trying to write some simulate sounder products in CF complaint > HDF-5 format for our upcoming satelite generated from IASI radiances (in > bufr file format). > Actually I am struggling to write a profile datasets as cf complaint > HDF5 product. Most of the pixels go away due to cloudiness or IASI > underlap over the Indian Region. > So rather than giving the regression retrievals for water vapor vertical > profiles as gridded datasets I was just thinking about give them as > feature:Profile. > I sent a mail to support-netcdf-java too because I am not able to get > any example CF complaint profile dataset from unidata site too. Your dataset is very close to CF complaint, you probably don't need a sample. I added two attributes to variable vw_level: <attribute name="units" value="km" /> <attribute name="axis" value="z"/> and it is recognized as profile feature type. I think CF doesn't like pressure coordinate. Since you are the one creating these datasets, converting to meter should be easy. Right now, I can load your dataset into the IDV as netCDF point data, and create a 2D display. It would be good to see a 3D profile display. Yuan > I am attaching herewith hdf5 product which contains water vapor profile > at 21 different pressure levels. My point is why profile data requires > altitude values as a coordinate. > It should be able to use pressure values too as a coordinate in place of > height values. I think that is the only reason that is holding it to be > cf complaint. > I know this may be a bit irrelevant in context of support-idv but I > thought its worth discussing with you. Or if you can suggest another > featureType for such a product. > > regards > Ghansham > > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: XKA-295690 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Closed