This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Rich- Man, you are just finding all kinds of things this week! > I've got a bundle here > http://coast-enviro.er.usgs.gov/models/share/mag_anom2.xidv > that has two displays which drape imagery over topography. > One is for Wyoming, one is for South Dakota (the mag anomaly data for > each state are in separate datasets). I thought you were an oceanographer. What are you doing in WY and SD? ;-) > Although I think the displays are identical, the lighting in SD looks > better (and different) than in Wyoming. > See: http://coast-enviro.er.usgs.gov/models/share/2009-10-30_0603.png > > Are their different light sources for each display? If so, that's > pretty odd for this purpose, where I was hoping to use IDV displays to > essentially merge the visual display of info for multiple states. It's a difference in the rendering due to the size of the grid. In Wyoming, changing from shaded to not shaded has no effect - it is always not-shaded. The grid size (> 1M points) is larger than the threshold (.5 M points) we have set. I know I had a really good reason for having a threshold back in 2003, but I can't seem to remember what that is now. I'm gonna remove it for now and the fix will be in the nightly build. > Or perhaps I just have the display settings set differently and just > couldn't figure out how they are set differently. > > I'm using the Nightly Build 2.8a1. Build Date: 2009-10-28 07:08 UTC Try using tomorrow's nightly build. Don Murray Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: PEX-267884 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open