This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
=============================================================================== Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ =============================================================================== ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 20:12:01 -0600 (CST) From: Gilbert Sebenste <address@hidden> To: Peter Schmid <address@hidden> Subject: Re: Data latencies: could much of this be avoided? On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Peter Schmid wrote: > The reason for this is that if you seperate out the feeds into two requests > with one of the being the hostname and the other being an IP then the ldm > issues two seperate pqact's for the two processes. So any backup in one feed > does not effect the other feed. Yes, yes, yes! I have yet to have ONE latency beyond, say, 10 seconds for IDS|DDPLUS and one minute for HRS since I have switched. That I can live with! ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** Internet: address@hidden (My opinions only!) ****** Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University **** E-mail: address@hidden *** web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** Work phone: 815-753-5492 * *******************************************************************************