[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No WSI feed from wsihcsn.unidata.ucar.edu to iita at 99082610 (fwd)
- Subject: Re: No WSI feed from wsihcsn.unidata.ucar.edu to iita at 99082610 (fwd)
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 16:03:57 -0600 (MDT)
===============================================================================
Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:56:39 -0600 (MDT)
From: David Himes <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
address@hidden
Subject: Re: No WSI feed from wsihcsn.unidata.ucar.edu to iita at 99082610
Hi all,
I only have time for a couple of comments right now(they're below) and will send
out more tomorrow, when I get back to work.
dave
According to Peter Neilley:
>
> All:
>
> I'd like to summarize/paraphrase Robb's note and other facts
> to help understand where we are now and what we need to
> do to correct this issue:
>
> - Large WSI data latencies between wsihcsn and iita started appearing last
> week once the iita (Linux box) was upgraded to LDM 5.0.8. At first,
> there
> was some speculation that these latencies were associated with
> work/changes
> in the network at FL4, but that theory has been discounted by Mike S. now
> that those changes are fixed/completed.
>
> - Before last week, and ever since the new iita machine was installed last
> spring, latencies between wsihcsn and iita were trivial.
>
> - Have there been any substantial changes in the volume of data feeding
> iita?
> There were some reports on the ldm-users email list that NOAAPORT NIDS
> products were getting through onto the IDD. Chiz fixed a regular
> expression pattern on thelma, but perhaps a similar fix needs to get
> in place on iita? Are there loads of NOAAPORT NIDS products arriving
> at iita directly from the UCAR NOAAPORT that are overwhelming iita?
> If this is not an issue, I know of no other changes in the datafeeds
> or the load on iita that bear on this problem.
>
> - Robb increased the pq size on iita, and cleaned up some rouge ldm
> processes on iita. This did not improve the situation.
>
> - Robb reported that ldmping from wsihcsn was refused by iita. This was
> corrected by "allow"ing wsihcsn at iita, but no improvement in
> throughput.
>
> - Robb reports problem with rpcinfo. We talked with our systems folks
> (ie Tres) and we don't know how to interpret this error, nor what
> to do about it.
>
> - Robb suggests the problem might be with the firewall since sites outside
> the firewall (like wsihcsn) are not seeing latencies: Questions:
>
> a) Why are so many sites getting data from wsihcsn? Who is
> shemp and torrent? Are they both FL4 sites? If so, one should
> feed the other. Why is ldm.comet getting data from wsihcsn
> rather than iita? Is that just a short term solution to get
> timely data to comet until this problem is solved?
I requested a feed from wsihcsn just yesterday, pending resolution of this
problem with latencies to iita. So, it has only been enabled for about 24
hours. I have not been monitoring it close since then, but we are running
about 5 to 10 minutes latency right now.
> b) Are sites that are getting the data timely running v5.0.8? Are
> any LINUX boxes?
We're still at 5.05.
>
>
> Have I summarized correctly? Where do we go from here?
I'll comment more tomorrow.:w
>
> Peter Neilley, NCAR/RAP
> address@hidden
> 303-497-8446
>