This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Unidata Support wrote: > > ------- Forwarded Message > > >From: Robert Mullenax <address@hidden> > >Subject: LDM reclass messages and non-zero status messages > >Organization: NMSU/NSBF > >Keywords: 199902081917.MAA18699 LDM RECLASS > > I guess I have been having some network problems between here and NIU > lately. I have been getting a lot of RECLASS messages and missing data. > I read that increased the max latency is possiblilty if you and your > downstream site have the same value set. What would the pro's and con's > of doing that? The bandwidth bottleneck is not here, it does appear > to be upstream (from traceroutes). Robert, It would be better to find another feeder site. Can you do traceroutes to the following sites and send the information back to me? Do it in the late afternoon when the congestion is high, gives a more accurate reading. weather.admin.niu.edu chinook.unl.edu stokes.metr.ou.edu sirocco.srcc.lsu.edu pluto.met.fsu.edu Robb... > Also about once or twice as day I receive a long string (about 50) > of pqact[..] child exited with status 1 messages. I can't find > a pattern but mainly seems to occur after I have had disconnects or > RECLASS messages, but not all of the time. Any ideas? > > Thanks > Robert Mullenax > > > > > ------- End of Forwarded Message > =============================================================================== Robb Kambic Unidata Program Center Software Engineer III Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research address@hidden WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ ===============================================================================